The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Merger Policies and Trade Liberalisation
Abstract
This paper is about the interactions between trade policy and a narrow but important aspect of competition policy, namely merger policy. We focus on links between merger policies and trade liberalisation. We put special emphasis on the topical issue of the role that international agreements such as the GATT play when merger policies are nationally chosen. Of particular concern is the possibility that liberalisation of international trade will induce countries to use competition policies to promote national interests at the expense of others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Domestic rivalry and export performance: Theory and evidence from international airline markets
Clougherty, J. A., & Zhang, A. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01515.x · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Horn, H., & Levinsohn, J.
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 470
- Pages
- 244-276
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0297
- OpenAlex
- W3122780891
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Merger Policies and Trade Liberalisation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-0297.00607
- The paper
- Horn, H., & Levinsohn, J. (2001). Merger Policies and Trade Liberalisation. The Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
