The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Interaction of Risk and Time Preferences: An Experimental Study
Abstract
Experimental studies of risk and time preference typically focus on one of the two phenomena. The goal of this paper is to investigate the (possible) correlation between subjects' attitude to risk and their time preference. For this sake we ask 61 subjects to price a simple lottery in three different scenarios. At the first, the lottery premium is paid `now'. At the second, it is paid `later'. At the third, it is paid `even later'. By comparing the certainty equivalents offered by the subjects for the three lotteries, we test how time and risk preferences are interrelated. Since the time interval between `now' and `later' is the same as between `later' and `even later', we also test the hypothesis of hyperbolic discounting. The main result is a statistically significant negative correlation between subjects' degrees of risk aversion and their (implicit) discount factors. Moreover, we show that the negative correlation is independent of the method used to elicit certainty equivalents (willingness to pay versus willingness to accept).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences
Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Rutström, E. E. (2008) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00848.x · Cited by 984
Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets
Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.7.3333 · Cited by 665
Impatience and Uncertainty: Experimental Decisions Predict Adolescents' Field Behavior
Sutter, M., Kocher, M. G., Glätzle-Rützler, D., & Trautmann, S. T. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.1.510 · Cited by 607
Discounting financial literacy: Time preferences and participation in financial education programs
Meier, S., & Sprenger, C. D. (2013) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.02.024 · Cited by 311
Encoding of Marginal Utility across Time in the Human Brain
Pine, A., Seymour, B., Roiser, J. P., Bossaerts, P., Friston, K. J., Curran, H. V., & Dolan, R. J. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1126-09.2009 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderhub, V., & Güth, W.
- Venue
- German Economic Review
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239-253
- ISSN
- 1465-6485 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0475
- OpenAlex
- W2132412154
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Interaction of Risk and Time Preferences: An Experimental Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-0475.00036
- The paper
- Anderhub, V., & Güth, W. (2001). On the Interaction of Risk and Time Preferences: An Experimental Study. German Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0475.00036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.