The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement
Abstract
We model the invention of new technologies and their diffusion across countries. In our model all countries grow at the same steady‐state rate, with each country's productivity ranking determined by how rapidly it adopts ideas. Research effort is determined by how much ideas earn at home and abroad. Patents affect the return to ideas. We relate the decision to patent an invention internationally to the cost of patenting in a country and to the expected value of patent protection in that country. We can thus infer the direction and magnitude of the international diffusion of technology from data on international patenting, productivity, and research. We fit the model to data from the five leading research economies. A rough summary of our findings is that the world lies about two‐thirds of the way from an extreme of technological autarky to an extreme of free trade in ideas. Research performed abroad is about two‐thirds as potent as domestic research. Together the United States and Japan drive at least two‐thirds of the growth in each of the countries in our sample.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988
Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937941 · Cited by 3,429
Cited by
Technology, Geography, and Trade
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00352 · Cited by 4,485
Self-citationThe expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance
Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 · Cited by 2,201
Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries*
Harrison, A., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2010) · Handbook of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52944-2.00001-x · Cited by 595
The Elusive Gains from International Financial Integration
GOURINCHAS, P.-O., & JEANNE, O. (2006) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2006.00393.x · Cited by 513
Technology spillover through trade and TFP convergence: 135 years of evidence for the OECD countries
Madsen, J. B. (2007) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.12.001 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Eaton, J., & Kortum, S.
- Venue
- International Economic Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 537-570
- ISSN
- 0020-6598 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2354
- OpenAlex
- W2103271134
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-2354.00028
- The paper
- Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (1999). International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement. International Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2354.00028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.