The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Humanising fascists? Nuance as an anthropological responsibility
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other scholars argued that it is a question of professional and political ethics to be attuned now more than ever to nuances, when describing, for example, right wing working class supporters (Pinheiro-Machado and Scalco 2021), arguing how such an anthropology can expand epistemological horizons (Alves da 2024) while also increasing its social relevance to contemporary problems (Hatzikidi 2024).”
From Political polarization and the liberal bias: A plea for an anthropology of the popular (2026) · cites this paper as Pinheiro-Machado and Scalco 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1111/amet.12471 · DOI
- 10.7476/9786586253726.0017 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315657417-10 · DOI
- Fabian J., 1983, Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object
- 10.1515/9780822372875-001 · DOI
- 10.1111/amet.12469 · DOI
- Harding S., 1991, Representing fundamentalism: the problem of the repugnant cultural other, Social Research, 58, 373
- Kalb D., 2011, Headlines of nation, subtexts of class: working class populism and the return of the repressed in neoliberal Europe, 1, 10.3167/9780857452030 · DOI
- Kalil I. O., 2018, Quem são e no que acreditam os eleitores de Jair Bolsonaro
- 10.1525/9780520950511 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011412 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-8322.12480 · DOI
- 10.1086/708627 · DOI
- Rosaldo R., 1991, Culture & truth: the remaking of social analysis: with a new introduction
Cited by
Political polarization and the liberal bias: A plea for an anthropology of the popular
Mandache, L.-A. (2026) · Human Organization · doi:10.1080/00187259.2025.2561702 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinheiro‐Machado, R., & Scalco, L.
- Affiliations
- Social and Policy Sciences University of Bath BathBA2 7AYUnited Kingdom
- Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul90040‐060Brazil
- Venue
- Social Anthropology
- Publisher
- Berghahn Books
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 329-336
- ISSN
- 0964-0282
- 1469-8676
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
