The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease—results of a national screening programme
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common congenital malformation and causes major morbidity and mortality. Prenatal detection improves the neonatal condition before surgery, resulting in less morbidity and mortality. In the Netherlands a national prenatal screening programme was introduced in 2007. This study evaluates the effects of this screening programme. Design: Geographical cohort study. Setting: Large referral region of three tertiary care centres. Population: Fetuses and infants diagnosed with severe CHD born between 1 January 2002 and 1 January 2012. Methods: Cases were divided into two groups: before and after the introduction of screening. Main outcome measures: Detection rates were calculated. Results: The prenatal detection rate (n = 1912) increased with 23.9% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 19.5–28.3) from 35.8 to 59.7% after the introduction of screening and of isolated CHD with 21.4% (95% CI 16.0–26.8) from 22.8 to 44.2%. The highest detection rates were found in the hypoplastic left heart syndrome, other univentricular defects and complex defects with atrial isomerism (>93%). Since the introduction of screening, the ‘late’ referrals (after 24 weeks of gestation) decreased by 24.3% (95% CI 19.3–29.3). Conclusions: This is the largest cohort study to investigate the prenatal detection rate of severe CHD in an unselected population. A nationally organised screening has resulted in a remarkably high detection rate of CHD (59.7%) compared with earlier literature.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In PRECOR, the prevalence of severe CHD, defined as heart defects needing surgery or a therapeutic intervention in the first year of life, is 2.3 of 1000 live births, which corresponds with earlier reported prevalence of CHD.The encountered prevalence in the registry is a strong indicator of the completeness of this registry.1”
From The effect of the introduction of the three‐vessel view on the detection rate of transposition of the great arteries and tetralogy of Fallot (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“However, since ToF is associated with a significant risk of genetic syndromes, 1 timely prenatal diagnosis provides the opportunity to perform genetic analysis during pregnancy, if desired by the parents.”
From The effect of the introduction of the three‐vessel view on the detection rate of transposition of the great arteries and tetralogy of Fallot (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Despite the relatively high prevalence, the detection rates (DRs) for ToF and TGA in prenatal screening programs need improvement, especially if studies based on regional cohorts are taken into account.1”
From The effect of the introduction of the three‐vessel view on the detection rate of transposition of the great arteries and tetralogy of Fallot (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Compared with those of other regional cohort studies 13,14 , the DRs for congenital heart defects (CHD) in the Netherlands are high (59.6% for all CHDs combined).1,15”
From The effect of the introduction of the three‐vessel view on the detection rate of transposition of the great arteries and tetralogy of Fallot (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Previously described screening programs looking at regional cohorts show persistently low DRs of 40% to 50% for all CHDs combined, with very low DRs for conotruncal anomalies like TGA and ToF in the majority of programs.1”
From The effect of the introduction of the three‐vessel view on the detection rate of transposition of the great arteries and tetralogy of Fallot (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
The incidence of congenital heart disease.
Hoffman, J. I. E., & Kaplan, S. (2002) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01886-7 · Cited by 6,099
Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide
van der Linde, D., Konings, E. E. M., Slager, M. A., Witsenburg, M., Helbing, W. A., Takkenberg, J. J. M., & Roos-Hesselink, J. W. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.025 · Cited by 3,452
CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: PREVALENCE AT LIVEBIRTH
Ferencz, C., Rubin, J. D., McCarter, R., Brenner, J. I., Neill, C. A., Perry, L. W., Hepner, S. I., & Downing, J. W. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113979 · Cited by 1,025
Congenital Heart Defects in Europe
Dolk, H. M., Loane, M. A., Garne, E., & a European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) Working Group (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.958405 · Cited by 962
Detection of Transposition of the Great Arteries in Fetuses Reduces Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality
Bonnet, D., Coltri, A., Butera, G., Fermont, L., Le Bidois, J., Kachaner, J., & Sidi, D. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.99.7.916 · Cited by 760
Prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta improves survival and reduces morbidity: Table 1
Franklin, O., Burch, M., Manning, N., Sleeman, K., Gould, S., & Archer, N. (2002) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heart.87.1.67 · Cited by 419
Mahle, W. T., Clancy, R. R., McGaurn, S. P., Goin, J. E., & Clark, B. J. (2001) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.107.6.1277 · Cited by 375
Fetal Aortic Valve Stenosis and the Evolution of Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome
Mäkikallio, K., McElhinney, D. B., Levine, J. C., Marx, G. R., Colan, S. D., Marshall, A. C., Lock, J. E., Marcus, E. N., & Tworetzky, W. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.588194 · Cited by 364
Bull, C. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01167-8 · Cited by 355
Garne, E., Stoll, C. G., & Clementi, M. (2001) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00385.x · Cited by 349
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bakker, M. K., Bergman, J. E. H., Krikov, S. V., Amar, E., Cocchi, G., Cragan, J. D., de Walle, H. E. K., Gatt, M., Groisman, B., Liu, S., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028139 · Cited by 276
ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): fetal cardiac screening
Carvalho, J. S., Axt-Fliedner, R., Chaoui, R., Copel, J. A., Cuneo, B. F., Goff, D., Kopylov, L. G., Hecher, K., Lee, W., Moon‐Grady, A. J., et al. (2023) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.26224 · Cited by 261
Why are congenital heart defects being missed?
van Nisselrooij, A. E. L., Teunissen, A. K. K., Clur, S. B., Rozendaal, L., Pajkrt, E., Linskens, I. H., Rammeloo, L. A. J., Lith, J. M. M. V., Blom, N. A., & Haak, M. C. (2019) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.20358 · Cited by 162
Self-citationMaternal Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus as Risk Factors for Congenital Heart Disease in the Offspring
Helle, E., & Priest, J. R. (2020) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.119.011541 · Cited by 151
Iragorri, N., & Spackman, E. (2018) · Public health reviews · doi:10.1186/s40985-018-0093-8 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- van Velzen, C., Clur, S., Rijlaarsdam, M., Bax, C., Pajkrt, E., Heymans, M., Bekker, M., Hruda, J., de Groot, C., Blom, N., & Haak, M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology Academic Medical Centre Emma Children's Hospital Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Paediatric Cardiology Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Leiden University (NL)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden the Netherlands
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01-27
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 400-407
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2097437284
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.amsterdamumc.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Universiteit Leiden
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
- Keywords
- congenital heart disease, prenatal screening, prenatal diagnosis, detection rate, national screening program, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, atrial isomerism, late referral, congenital malformations
- MeSH terms
- Female, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Netherlands, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Program Evaluation, Ultrasonography, Prenatal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
