Cited by 89Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolencePsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Alcohol-Involved Rapes: Are They More Violent?

Open access
Abbey, Antonia, Clinton, A. Monique, McAuslan, Pam, Zawacki, Tina, Buck, Philip O.·2002·Psychology of Women Quarterly

Abstract

Alcohol's psychological, cognitive, and motor effects contribute to rape. Based on theory and past research, we hypothesized that there would be a curvilinear relationship between the quantity of alcohol consumed by perpetrators and how aggressively they behaved. Moderate levels of intoxication encourage aggressiveness; however, extreme levels severely inhibit cognitive and motor capacity. We also hypothesized that victims' alcohol consumption would have a curvilinear relationship to their resistance. These hypotheses were examined with data from 132 college women who had been the victims of attempted or completed rape. Although there was a curvilinear result for perpetrators, the slope of the curve suggested that aggressiveness was worst when no alcohol or the highest levels of alcohol were consumed. There was a negative linear relationship between victims' alcohol consumption and resistance. Difficulties associated with accurately assessing degree of intoxication from survey data are discussed and suggestions are made for improving alcohol measurement in rape research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-6402.00048

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have found greater use of force, threat or injury for NDFSA that could explain greater PTS for this group.

    “some studies have found greater use of force, threat or injury for NDFSA that could explain greater PTS for this group (Abbey, Clinton, McAuslan, Zawacki, & Buck, 2002; Masters et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abbey, A., Clinton, A. M., McAuslan, P., Zawacki, T., & Buck, P. O.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Wayne State University
  • University of Michigan–Dearborn (US)
Corresponding author
Abbey, Antonia
Venue
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Published
2002-06
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
99-109
ISSN
  • 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6402
OpenAlex
W2100908295
Cited by
89
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of Women Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA011996)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH047181)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
sexual assault, victim resistance, alcohol intoxication, curvilinear relationship, female university students, alcohol measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review