The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Closing A Conceptual Gap: The Case For A Description Of English As A Lingua Franca
Open accessAbstract
Despite momentous developments in the sociopolitics of the teaching of English worldwide, targets have generally remained tied to native‐speaker norms. This paper argues that although this orientation is often recognized as inappropriate and counter‐productive, it persists because discussions about ‘global English’ on the meta‐level have not been accompanied by a necessary reorientation in linguistic research: very little empirical work has so far been done on the most extensive contemporary use of English worldwide, namely English as a lingua franca, largely among ‘non‐native’ speakers. The paper seeks to demonstrate that this lack of a descriptive reality precludes us from conceiving of speakers of lingua franca English as language users in their own right and thus makes it dif?cult to counteract the reproduction of native English dominance. To remedy this situation, a research agenda is proposed which accords lingua franca English a central place in description alongside English as a native language, and a new corpus project is described which constitutes a ?rst step in this process. The paper concludes with a consideration of the potentially very signi?cant impact that the availability of an alternative model for the teaching of English as a lingua franca would have for pedagogy and teacher education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Widdowson, H. G. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587438 · Cited by 1,140
Cited by
Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca
Jenkins, J., Cogo, A., & Dewey, M. (2011) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444811000115 · Cited by 722
Own-language use in language teaching and learning
Hall, G., & Cook, G. (2012) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000067 · Cited by 466
Tajeddin, Z., & Teimournezhad, S. (2015) · The Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2013.869942 · Cited by 185
Ryan, S. (2006) · Critical Inquiry in Language Studies · doi:10.1207/s15427595cils0301_2 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Seidlhofer, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-158
- ISSN
- 0802-6106 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-4192
- OpenAlex
- W2096116546
- Cited by
- 1,029
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 71.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Closing A Conceptual Gap: The Case For A Description Of English As A Lingua Franca. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1473-4192.00011
- The paper
- Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing A Conceptual Gap: The Case For A Description Of English As A Lingua Franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.