CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 98Income, Poverty, and InequalityPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEconomic and Environmental Valuation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Panel Data on Income Satisfaction to Estimate Equivalence Scale Elasticity

Open access
Schwarze, Johannes·2003·Review of Income and Wealth
DOI 10.1111/1475-4991.00092
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this paper, the equivalence scale elasticity will be estimated by using individual panel data on income satisfaction from the German Socio‐Economic Panel Study (GSOEP). Satisfaction or happiness data have been more frequently used by economists in recent years to analyze individual well‐being. The approach differs from other subjective approaches as respondents are requested to evaluate current income rather than income in hypothetical situations. The estimated scale elasticity is higher compared to those from other subjective approaches based on German data. In addition, panel data enable different scale use by the respondents to be controlled. It can be shown that elasticity decreases when unobserved fixed‐effects are controlled for.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-4991.00092

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Arellano M., 2001, Handbook of Econometrics, 3229
  2. 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1999.tb00364.x · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1996.tb00190.x · DOI
  4. Chrouchley R., 1995, “A Random‐effects Model for Ordered Categorical Data,”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 489, 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476540 · DOI
  5. Citro C. F., 1995, Measuring Poverty. A New Approach
  6. 10.2307/2234639 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.2307/2234376 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1467-8586.1992.tb00538.x · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/1468-0475.00009 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF00166646 · DOI
  12. Garner Th. I. L.Stinson andSt.Shipp “Subjective Assessments of Economic Well‐Being and Preliminary Findings from Miami ”Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings(http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/papers/1997_156.pdf) 1997.
  13. 10.2307/145372 · DOI
  14. Greene W. H. Econometric Analysis 4th edition Prentice‐Hall International London 2000.
  15. 10.2307/145778 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S0047279400019760 · DOI
  17. Johnson D. S., 1995, “Unique Equivalence Scales. Estimation and Implications for Distributional Analysis,”, Journal of Income Distribution, 4, 215
  18. 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1992.tb00427.x · DOI
  19. 10.1086/298304 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/978-3-642-50003-9_5 · DOI
  21. Schwarze J.andM.Härpfer “Are People Inequality Averse and Do They Prefer Redistribution by the State? Evidence from German Longitudinal Data on Life Satisfaction ”Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Discussion Paper No. 430 Bonn 2002. · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90031-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0167-4870(92)90052-9 · DOI
  24. Stinson L. “Using the ‘Delighted/Terrible’ Scale to Measure Feelings About Income ”Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings(http://www.bls.gov/ore/abstract/st/st960100.htm) 1997.
  25. 10.1007/BF00163069 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0304-4076(91)90090-Z · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1982.tb00621.x · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90052-3 · DOI
  29. 10.2307/145775 · DOI
  30. Wagner G. G., 1993, “The English Language Public Use File of the German Socio‐Economic Panel,”, Journal of Human Resources, 28, 429
  31. 10.1111/1468-0335.00111 · DOI

Cited by

See all 98

Metadata

Authors
Schwarze, J.
Affiliations
German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Schwarze, Johannes
Venue
Review of Income and Wealth
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
359-372
ISSN
  • 0034-6586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4991
DOI
10.1111/1475-4991.00092
OpenAlex
W3122843191
Cited by
98
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
14.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 8 d)
Locations
  • Review of Income and Wealth (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
equivalence scales, income satisfaction, happiness, subjective well-being, panel data, scale elasticity, German Socio-Economic Panel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review