The DOI matches its Crossref record.
River meander behaviour and instability: a framework for analysis
Abstract
Recent empirical and theoretical work on river meanders suggests that instability is inherent. Within this context, an occurrence of multiple cut‐offs could be interpreted as a clustering associated with self‐organized criticality. Types of meander behaviour ranging from stable to chaotic are examined as trajectories or attractors within the phase space of rate of meander movement and bend curvature and change to the system is explored as shift from one attractor to another. It is suggested that this new approach provides insights into meander dynamics and provides a basis to identify the conditions, limits and constraints under which different behaviour occurs. Basic controls of energy and resistance underlie planform behaviour, but need to be refined in relation to the morphology and stability of channel courses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sivapalan, M., & Blöschl, G. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017896 · Cited by 353
A new framework for modeling the migration of meandering rivers
Parker, G., Shimizu, Y., Wilkerson, G. V., Eke, E. C., Abad, J. D., Lauer, J. W., Paola, C., Dietrich, W. E., & Voller, V. R. (2011) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.2113 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Hooke, J.
- Venue
- Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-253
- ISSN
- 0020-2754 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-5661
- OpenAlex
- W1919434112
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: River meander behaviour and instability: a framework for analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1475-5661.00089
- The paper
- Hooke, J. (2003). River meander behaviour and instability: a framework for analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.