Cited by 17Migration and Labor DynamicsMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationEuropean Law and Migration

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Projecting the fiscal impact of immigration in the European Union

Open access

Abstract

Abstract The increasing flow of immigrants into Europe over the last decade has generated a range of considerations in the policy agenda of many receiving countries. One of the main considerations for policymakers and public opinion alike is whether immigrants contribute their ‘fair’ share to their host country's tax and welfare system. In this paper, we assess the net fiscal impact of intra‐EU and extra‐EU migration in 27 European Union (EU) Member States. We find that migrants in the EU, on average, contribute more than natives to welfare states. However, when we take an age‐specific life‐cycle perspective, we find that natives generally show a higher net fiscal contribution than both groups of migrants. Among migrants, extra‐EU migrants contribute less than intra‐EU migrants. We then use a demographic microsimulation model to project the potential net fiscal impact of migration in the EU into the future. We show that despite the fact that intra‐EU migration contributes to reduce the strong negative impact of population ageing, its contribution is not sufficient to offset the negative fiscal consequences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-5890.12314

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.11 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s10797-016-9394-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2010.00859.x · DOI
  4. Bogdanov L. Hristova A. Yotov K. Bruno E. Valcke A.&Barber T.(2014) Fiscal impact of EU migrants in Austria Germany the Netherlands and the United Kingdom available at SSRN http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2568125. · DOI
  5. Böheim R.&Mayr K.(2005) Immigration and public spending IZA Discussion Paper 1834. · DOI
  6. 10.1628/0015221014006233 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/209933 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/twec.12057 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00148-009-0286-z · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2015.12059 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1526062 · DOI
  12. Christl M., 2022, Who pays more? Heterogeneity in effective VAT rates across native and migrant households, Scienze Regionali, 21, 67
  13. Colas M.&Sachs D.(2020) The indirect fiscal benefits of low‐skilled immigration CESifo Working Paper 8604. · DOI
  14. 10.1023/B:ITAX.0000021975.20256.ff · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.01.005 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/ecoj.12179 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2010.00106.x · DOI
  18. 10.2202/1935-1682.1655 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s10680-010-9227-5 · DOI
  20. Elsner B.&Concannon J.(2020) Immigration and redistribution IZA Discussion Paper 13676. · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1091142113506930 · DOI
  22. Fiorio C. V.et al. (2022) Migration and public finances in the EU Technical report Joint Research Centre (Seville site). · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s001480000043 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s00148-017-0636-1 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s001480050105 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/dem.2019.4 · DOI
  27. 10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.6 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s10663-005-1758-3 · DOI
  29. OECD, 2013, International Migration Outlook
  30. Oxford Economics, 2018, The fiscal impact of immigration in the UK, A report for the Migration Advisory Committee
  31. 10.1553/populationyearbook2020.res02 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/sjoe.12092 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s00148-005-0027-x · DOI
  34. Sinn H.‐W., 2001, Immigration following EU Eastern enlargement, CESifo Forum, 2, 40
  35. 10.1007/0-306-47372-0 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/1467-9442.t01-2-00009 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S1571-0386(06)16029-9 · DOI
  38. 10.34196/ijm.00075 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/restud/rdz027 · DOI
  40. Vargas‐Silva C., 2015, Handbook of the Economics of International Migration, 845

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Christl, M., Bélanger, A., Conte, A., Mazza, J., & Narazani, E.
Affiliations
  • European Commission (BE)
  • Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (CA)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Christl, Michael
Venue
Fiscal Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-12
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
365-385
ISSN
  • 0143-5671 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-5890
OpenAlex
W4312081217
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fiscal Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada)) (submittedVersion)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Law › European Law and Migration
Keywords
immigration, intra-European migration, tax contribution, life cycle perspective, population aging, EU member states, public finance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review