The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A compromising mindset? How citizens evaluate the trade‐offs in coalition politics
Open accessAbstract
Coalition building depends on citizens having a ‘compromising mindset’: they must accept that parties need to compromise in order to gain influence and that this entails deviating from the original policy positions. In this study, we show that European citizens understand that compromise is essential for democratic governance and that they, holding everything else constant, prefer political parties that express a willingness to compromise. This finding appears to be independent from specific forms of coalition politics and to be widespread across different levels of political interest, formal education and even ideological extremity. Our analysis compares observational data from the Austrian National Election Survey (AUTNES) 2020 and an original survey from Denmark in 2021. We also present results from a conjoint experiment fielded in Denmark, which evaluates the effect of willingness to compromise on vote choice. Our finding is good news for European democracies where coalition politics and thus compromise is a necessity for governance. Yet, for vote‐seeking politics, the situation is complex as citizens might sometimes punish parties for compromising, but sometimes also punish them for not compromising.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpt024 · Cited by 1,990
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Aichholzer J. Partheymüller J. Wagner M. Kritzinger S. Plescia C. Eberl J.‐M. Meyer T. Berk N. Büttner N. Boomgaarden H.&Müller W. C.(2020).“10096_mr_en_v1_0.pdf” AUTNES Online Panel Study 2017‐2019 (SUF edition) https://doi.org/10.11587/QDETRI/AVPTWT AUSSDA V1 · DOI
- 10.1017/pan.2022.16 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01370.x · DOI
- 10.1086/708629 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780198868484.003.0005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.09.007 · DOI
- 10.1086/693369 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108877053 · DOI
- 10.1111/1475-6765.12094 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003055420000763 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00623.x · DOI
- 10.1017/XPS.2017.2 · DOI
- 10.1086/688678 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1537592710003270 · DOI
- 10.1111/lsq.12048 · DOI
- Hjermitslev I. B., 2020, The electoral cost of coalition participation: Can anyone escape?, Party Politics, 26, 510
- 10.1111/1475-6765.12537 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1111/ajps.12481 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11109-016-9379-z · DOI
- 10.1086/708239 · DOI
- Laver M., 1990, Multiparty government: The politics of coalition in Europe
- 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003055420000337 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-658-29558-5_5 · DOI
- 10.1111/1475-6765.12377 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780198868484.003.0003 · DOI
- 10.1080/17457289.2016.1270286 · DOI
- 10.1177/1354068819827513 · DOI
- 10.1111/1475-6765.12450 · DOI
- Schneider C. J., 2019, The responsive union: National elections and European governance
- 10.1111/ssqu.12813 · DOI
- 10.1111/1475-6765.12169 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780197510490.001.0001 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Green‐Pedersen, C., & Hjermitslev, I. B.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Hjermitslev, Ida B.
- Venue
- European Journal of Political Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2024-05
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 539-555
- ISSN
- 0304-4130 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6765
- OpenAlex
- W4388112753
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 10.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Political Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Aarhus Universitet
- Universität Wien
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
- Keywords
- coalition politics, compromise, willingness to compromise, party evaluation, vote choice, political parties, policy positions, European democracy, political interest, Austria, Denmark
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review