The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Quantitative Measurement of Organizational Culture in Health Care: A Review of the Available Instruments
Open accessAbstract
Objective. To review the quantitative instruments available to health service researchers who want to measure culture and cultural change. Data Sources. A literature search was conducted using Medline, Cinahl, Helmis, Psychlit, Dhdata, and the database of the King's Fund in London for articles published up to June 2001, using the phrase “organizational culture.” In addition, all citations and the gray literature were reviewed and advice was sought from experts in the field to identify instruments not found on the electronic databases. The search focused on instruments used to quantify culture with a track record, or potential for use, in health care settings. Data Extraction. For each instrument we examined the cultural dimensions addressed, the number of items for each questionnaire, the measurement scale adopted, examples of studies that had used the tool, the scientific properties of the instrument, and its strengths and limitations. Principal Findings. Thirteen instruments were found that satisfied our inclusion criteria, of which nine have a track record in studies involving health care organizations. The instruments varied considerably in terms of their grounding in theory, format, length, scope, and scientific properties. Conclusions. A range of instruments with differing characteristics are available to researchers interested in organizational culture, all of which have limitations in terms of their scope, ease of use, or scientific properties. The choice of instrument should be determined by how organizational culture is conceptualized by the research team, the purpose of the investigation, intended use of the results, and availability of resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Naegele, K. D., & Goffman, E. (1956) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089106 · Cited by 25,991
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
Goffman, E. (2023) · Social Theory Re-Wired · doi:10.4324/9781003320609-59 · Cited by 17,562
Organizational culture and leadership
(1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90120-5 · Cited by 16,462
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,062
Organizational Culture and Leadership
Tierney, W. G., & Schein, E. H. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258322 · Cited by 9,601
Morgan, G. (1986) · Cited by 5,650
Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis.
Louis, M. R., Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392394 · Cited by 5,588
Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis
Smircich, L. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392246 · Cited by 4,044
Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study Across Twenty Cases
Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393392 · Cited by 3,234
Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation.
Sutton, F. X., & Selznick, P. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088633 · Cited by 2,923
Cited by
Association between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes: systematic review
Braithwaite, J., Herkes, J., Ludlow, K., Testa, L., & Lamprell, G. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017708 · Cited by 532
Defining and Measuring the Patient-Centered Medical Home
Stange, K. C., Nutting, P. A., Miller, W. L., Jaén, C. R., Crabtree, B. F., Flocke, S. A., & Gill, J. M. (2010) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1291-3 · Cited by 516
Mendel, P., Meredith, L. S., Schoenbaum, M., Sherbourne, C. D., & Wells, K. B. (2008) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0144-9 · Cited by 407
Wahr, J. A., Prager, R. L., Abernathy, J. H., Martinez, E. A., Salas, E., Seifert, P. C., Groom, R. C., Spiess, B. D., Searles, B. E., Sundt, T. M., et al. (2013) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3182a38efa · Cited by 334
Cabassa, L. J., & Baumann, A. A. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-90 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, T., Mannion, R., Davies, H., & Marshall, M.
- Venue
- Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05-23
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 923-945
- ISSN
- 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6773
- OpenAlex
- W2067857772
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 28.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Quantitative Measurement of Organizational Culture in Health Care: A Review of the Available Instruments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1475-6773.00154
- The paper
- Scott, T., Mannion, R., Davies, H., & Marshall, M. (2003). The Quantitative Measurement of Organizational Culture in Health Care: A Review of the Available Instruments. Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.00154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.