Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Demonstration of the Impact of Response Bias on the Results of Patient Satisfaction Surveys

Open access
Mazor, Kathleen M, Clauser, Brian E, Field, Terry, Yood, Robert A, Gurwitz, Jerry H·2002·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objectives. The purposes of the present study were to examine patient satisfaction survey data for evidence of response bias, and to demonstrate, using simulated data, how response bias may impact interpretation of results. Data Sources. Patient satisfaction ratings of primary care providers (family practitioners and general internists) practicing in the context of a group‐model health maintenance organization and simulated data generated to be comparable to the actual data. Study Design. Correlational analysis of actual patient satisfaction data, followed by a simulation study where response bias was modeled, with comparison of results from biased and unbiased samples. Principal Findings. A positive correlation was found between mean patient satisfaction rating and response rate in the actual patient satisfaction data. Simulation results suggest response bias could lead to overestimation of patient satisfaction overall, with this effect greatest for physicians with the lowest satisfaction scores. Conclusions. Findings suggest that response bias may significantly impact the results of patient satisfaction surveys, leading to overestimation of the level of satisfaction in the patient population overall. Estimates of satisfaction may be most inflated for providers with the least satisfied patients, thereby threatening the validity of provider‐level comparisons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-6773.11194

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Mazor, K. M., Clauser, B. E., Field, T., Yood, R. A., & Gurwitz, J. H.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
1403-1417
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2036931032
Cited by
326
References
26
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Demonstration of the Impact of Response Bias on the Results of Patient Satisfaction Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1475-6773.11194
The paper
Mazor, K. M., Clauser, B. E., Field, T., Yood, R. A., & Gurwitz, J. H. (2002). A Demonstration of the Impact of Response Bias on the Results of Patient Satisfaction Surveys. Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.11194

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.