The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Demonstration of the Impact of Response Bias on the Results of Patient Satisfaction Surveys
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. The purposes of the present study were to examine patient satisfaction survey data for evidence of response bias, and to demonstrate, using simulated data, how response bias may impact interpretation of results. Data Sources. Patient satisfaction ratings of primary care providers (family practitioners and general internists) practicing in the context of a group‐model health maintenance organization and simulated data generated to be comparable to the actual data. Study Design. Correlational analysis of actual patient satisfaction data, followed by a simulation study where response bias was modeled, with comparison of results from biased and unbiased samples. Principal Findings. A positive correlation was found between mean patient satisfaction rating and response rate in the actual patient satisfaction data. Simulation results suggest response bias could lead to overestimation of patient satisfaction overall, with this effect greatest for physicians with the lowest satisfaction scores. Conclusions. Findings suggest that response bias may significantly impact the results of patient satisfaction surveys, leading to overestimation of the level of satisfaction in the patient population overall. Estimates of satisfaction may be most inflated for providers with the least satisfied patients, thereby threatening the validity of provider‐level comparisons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals
Asch, D. A., Jedrziewski, M. K., & Christakis, N. A. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1 · Cited by 2,110
Krosnick, J. A. (1999) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537 · Cited by 1,852
Patient Satisfaction With Hospital Care: Effects of Demographic and Institutional Characteristics
Young, G. J., Meterko, M., & Desai, K. R. (2000) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200003000-00009 · Cited by 392
Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey
Etter, J.-F., & Perneger, T. V. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00166-2 · Cited by 351
A National Survey of the Arrangements Managed-Care Plans Make with Physicians
Gold, M. R., Hurley, R., Lake, T., Ensor, T., & Berenson, R. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512213332505 · Cited by 271
Methods of Measuring Patient Satisfaction in Health Care Organizations
Ford, R. C., Bach, S. A., & Fottler, M. D. (1997) · Health Care Management Review · doi:10.1097/00004010-199704000-00009 · Cited by 248
Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter?
Templeton, L., Deehan, A., Taylor, C., Drummond, C., & Strang, J. (1997) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 229
Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey
Hill, A., Roberts, J., Ewings, P., & Gunnell, D. (1997) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024610 · Cited by 221
The Use of Patient Perceptions in the Evaluation of Health-Care Delivery Systems
Rosenthal, G. E., & Shannon, S. E. (1997) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199711001-00007 · Cited by 210
Launer, L. J., Wind, A. W., & Deeg, D. J. H. (1994) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117077 · Cited by 182
Cited by
Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review
Verhoef, L. M., Van de Belt, T. H., Engelen, L. J., Schoonhoven, L., & Kool, R. B. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3024 · Cited by 130
Simulation Experiments on (the Absence of) Ratings Bias in Reputation Systems
Thebault-Spieker, J., Kluver, D., Klein, M. A., Halfaker, A., Hecht, B., Terveen, L., & Konstan, J. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3134736 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazor, K. M., Clauser, B. E., Field, T., Yood, R. A., & Gurwitz, J. H.
- Venue
- Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1403-1417
- ISSN
- 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6773
- OpenAlex
- W2036931032
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Demonstration of the Impact of Response Bias on the Results of Patient Satisfaction Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1475-6773.11194
- The paper
- Mazor, K. M., Clauser, B. E., Field, T., Yood, R. A., & Gurwitz, J. H. (2002). A Demonstration of the Impact of Response Bias on the Results of Patient Satisfaction Surveys. Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.11194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.