The Journey through Grief: Insights from a Qualitative Study of Electronic Health Record Implementation
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To improve understanding of facilitators of EHR system implementation, paying particular attention to opportunities to maximize physician adoption and effective deployment. Data Sources/Study Setting: Primary data collected from 47 physician and 35 administrative key informants from six U.S. health care organizations identified because of purported success with EHR implementation. Study Design: We conducted interviews and focus groups in an extensive qualitative study. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Verbatim transcripts were analyzed both deductively and inductively using the constant comparative method. Principal Findings: Conceptualizing EHR adoption as loss through the lens of Kübler‐Ross's five stages of grief model may help individuals and organizations more effectively orient to the challenge of change. Coupled with Kotter's eight‐step change management framework, we offer a structure to facilitate organizations' movement through the EHR implementation journey. Combining insights from these frameworks, we identify 10 EHR strategies that can help address EHR implementation barriers. Conclusions: Loss is one part of change often overlooked. Addressing it directly and compassionately can potentially facilitate the EHR implementation journey. We offer a summarized list of deployment strategies that are sensitive to these issues to support physician transition to new technologies that will bring value to clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Accepting the truths that lead to a successful organizational change initiative can be similar to the typical phases of grief.
“accepting the truth(s) that lead to a successful organizational change initiative can be similar to the typical phases of grief.”
From Organizational Change: Considering Truth and Buy-In (2022) · cites this paper as McAlearney et al. 2015
The typical phases of grief often include denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and finally acceptance (i.e., buy-in).
“Those phases often include denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and finally acceptance (i.e., buy-in)”
From Organizational Change: Considering Truth and Buy-In (2022) · cites this paper as McAlearney et al. 2015
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-231 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Costs and benefits of health information technology.
Shekelle, P. G., Morton, S. C., & Keeler, E. B. (2006) · doi:10.23970/ahrqepcerta132 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organizational Change: Considering Truth and Buy-In
Hubbart, J. A. (2022) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci13010003 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“Those phases often include denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and finally acceptance (i.e., buy-in) ((McAlearney et al. 2015; Romadona and Setiawan 2021), and references therein) (Figure 2).”
BackgroundA qualitative study of physician perspectives on adaptation to electronic health records
Sieck, C. J., Pearl, N., Bright, T. J., & Yen, P.-Y. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-1030-6 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationA retrospective analysis of boarding times for adolescents in psychiatric crisis
Campbell, M., & Pierce, J. (2018) · Social Work in Health Care · doi:10.1080/00981389.2018.1434586 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- McAlearney, A. S., Hefner, J. L., Sieck, C. J., & Huerta, T. R.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McAlearney, Ann Scheck
- Venue
- Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-15
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 462-488
- ISSN
- 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6773
- PMC
- PMC4369218
- OpenAlex
- W2066551425
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ohio State University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- electronic health record implementation, physician adoption, grief models, Kübler-Ross stages of grief, change management, Kotter's change model, implementation barriers, health care organization, deployment strategies
- MeSH terms
- Grief, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Life Change Events, Physicians, United States, Qualitative Research, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review