Cited by 38Pressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementNursing education and managementHealthcare Quality and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modeling Hospital‐Acquired Pressure Ulcer Prevalence on Medical‐Surgical Units: Nurse Workload, Expertise, and Clinical Processes of Care

Open access

Abstract

Objective: This study modeled the predictive power of unit/patient characteristics, nurse workload, nurse expertise, and hospital‐acquired pressure ulcer (HAPU) preventive clinical processes of care on unit‐level prevalence of HAPU s. Data Sources: Seven hundred and eighty‐nine medical‐surgical units (215 hospitals) in 2009. Study Design: Using unit‐level data, HAPU s were modeled with Poisson regression with zero‐inflation (due to low prevalence of HAPU s) with significant covariates as predictors. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Hospitals submitted data on NQF endorsed ongoing performance measures to CALNOC registry. Principal Findings: Fewer HAPU s were predicted by a combination of unit/patient characteristics (shorter length of stay, fewer patients at‐risk, fewer male patients), RN workload (more hours of care, greater patient [bed] turnover), RN expertise (more years of experience, fewer contract staff hours), and processes of care (more risk assessment completed). Conclusions: Unit/patient characteristics were potent HAPU predictors yet generally are not modifiable. RN workload, nurse expertise, and processes of care (risk assessment/interventions) are significant predictors that can be addressed to reduce HAPU. Support strategies may be needed for units where experienced full‐time nurses are not available for HAPU prevention. Further research is warranted to test these finding in the context of higher HAPU prevalence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-6773.12244

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1093/intqhc/14.1.5 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182330b6e · DOI
  4. Alquist S. B., 2006, 1301, An Act to Add Sections 1279.1, 1279.2, 1279.3, and 1280.4 to the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Health Facilities
  5. American Hospital Association, 2003, American Annual Survey Database: Fiscal Year 2003
  6. American Nurses Association, 1997, Implementing Nursing's Report Card: A Study of RN Staffing, Length of Stay and Patient Outcomes
  7. American Nurses Association, 2000, Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes in the Inpatient Hospital Setting (Executive Summary)
  8. 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.726 · DOI
  9. 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0588 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04066.x · DOI
  11. Aydin C. E., 2008, Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 1: Assessment), 217
  12. 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.4.41605 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31827f2028 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/jama.2008.729 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0193945909355149 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/1527154407312737 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/1077558707299248 · DOI
  18. California Senate Bill 1301.2006.Chapter 647 Statutes of 2007 with Regard to Reporting of Pressure Ulcers (Section 1279.1 (b)(4)
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511814365 · DOI
  20. 10.1097/00006199-200303000-00003 · DOI
  21. Clarke S., 2008, Patient Safety & Quality: An Evidence‐Based Handbook for Nurses, 1
  22. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.019 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.01.005 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/1527154410392240 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000081 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/1527154405280107 · DOI
  27. Duffield C., 2009, Churn: Patient Turnover and Case Mix, Nursing Economics, 27, 185
  28. 10.1016/j.apnr.2009.12.004 · DOI
  29. 10.1097/00006199-200503000-00002 · DOI
  30. 10.1097/01.ASW.0000391184.43845.c1 · DOI
  31. The Joint Commission, 2009, Implementation Guide for the NQF Endorsed Nursing‐Sensitive Care Measure Set, Version 2.0
  32. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01326.x · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0193945906290323 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04106.x · DOI
  35. 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31822228dc · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00228.x · DOI
  37. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, 2009, Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline
  38. National Quality Forum, 2004, National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Nursing‐Sensitive Care: An Initial Performance Measure Set
  39. 10.1056/NEJMsa012247 · DOI
  40. 10.1056/NEJMsa1001025 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1002/nur.21474 · DOI
  42. Russo C. A., 2008, Hospitalizations Related to Pressure Ulcers among Adults 18 Years and Older, 2006: Statistical Brief #64. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs
  43. 10.1097/01.ASW.0000425935.94874.41 · DOI
  44. 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00016 · DOI
  45. 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182358968 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S1553-7250(08)34014-8 · DOI
  47. 10.1097/00129334-200701000-00012 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aydin, C., Donaldson, N., Stotts, N. A., Fridman, M., & Brown, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • AMF Consulting, Inc. Los Angeles CA
  • Kaiser Permanente Northern California (US)
Corresponding author
Aydin, Carolyn
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-07
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
351-373
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2060223623
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
FWCI
13.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CDU eSpace Institutional Repository (Charles Darwin University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
hospital-acquired pressure ulcers, pressure ulcer prevention, nursing workload, nursing expertise, risk assessment, medical-surgical units, length of hospital stay, patient characteristics
MeSH terms
Aged, Clinical Protocols, Pressure Ulcer, Female, Hospital Administration, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Quality of Health Care, Prevalence, Workload, Risk Assessment, Quality Indicators, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review