The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling Hospital‐Acquired Pressure Ulcer Prevalence on Medical‐Surgical Units: Nurse Workload, Expertise, and Clinical Processes of Care
Open accessAbstract
Objective: This study modeled the predictive power of unit/patient characteristics, nurse workload, nurse expertise, and hospital‐acquired pressure ulcer (HAPU) preventive clinical processes of care on unit‐level prevalence of HAPU s. Data Sources: Seven hundred and eighty‐nine medical‐surgical units (215 hospitals) in 2009. Study Design: Using unit‐level data, HAPU s were modeled with Poisson regression with zero‐inflation (due to low prevalence of HAPU s) with significant covariates as predictors. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Hospitals submitted data on NQF endorsed ongoing performance measures to CALNOC registry. Principal Findings: Fewer HAPU s were predicted by a combination of unit/patient characteristics (shorter length of stay, fewer patients at‐risk, fewer male patients), RN workload (more hours of care, greater patient [bed] turnover), RN expertise (more years of experience, fewer contract staff hours), and processes of care (more risk assessment completed). Conclusions: Unit/patient characteristics were potent HAPU predictors yet generally are not modifiable. RN workload, nurse expertise, and processes of care (risk assessment/interventions) are significant predictors that can be addressed to reduce HAPU. Support strategies may be needed for units where experienced full‐time nurses are not available for HAPU prevention. Further research is warranted to test these finding in the context of higher HAPU prevalence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.1093/intqhc/14.1.5 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182330b6e · DOI
- Alquist S. B., 2006, 1301, An Act to Add Sections 1279.1, 1279.2, 1279.3, and 1280.4 to the Health and Safety Code, Relating to Health Facilities
- American Hospital Association, 2003, American Annual Survey Database: Fiscal Year 2003
- American Nurses Association, 1997, Implementing Nursing's Report Card: A Study of RN Staffing, Length of Stay and Patient Outcomes
- American Nurses Association, 2000, Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes in the Inpatient Hospital Setting (Executive Summary)
- 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.726 · DOI
- 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0588 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04066.x · DOI
- Aydin C. E., 2008, Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 1: Assessment), 217
- 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.4.41605 · DOI
- 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31827f2028 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2008.729 · DOI
- 10.1177/0193945909355149 · DOI
- 10.1177/1527154407312737 · DOI
- 10.1177/1077558707299248 · DOI
- California Senate Bill 1301.2006.Chapter 647 Statutes of 2007 with Regard to Reporting of Pressure Ulcers (Section 1279.1 (b)(4)
- 10.1017/CBO9780511814365 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006199-200303000-00003 · DOI
- Clarke S., 2008, Patient Safety & Quality: An Evidence‐Based Handbook for Nurses, 1
- 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1177/1527154410392240 · DOI
- 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000081 · DOI
- 10.1177/1527154405280107 · DOI
- Duffield C., 2009, Churn: Patient Turnover and Case Mix, Nursing Economics, 27, 185
- 10.1016/j.apnr.2009.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006199-200503000-00002 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.ASW.0000391184.43845.c1 · DOI
- The Joint Commission, 2009, Implementation Guide for the NQF Endorsed Nursing‐Sensitive Care Measure Set, Version 2.0
- 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01326.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0193945906290323 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04106.x · DOI
- 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31822228dc · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00228.x · DOI
- National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, 2009, Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline
- National Quality Forum, 2004, National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Nursing‐Sensitive Care: An Initial Performance Measure Set
- 10.1056/NEJMsa012247 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMsa1001025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/nur.21474 · DOI
- Russo C. A., 2008, Hospitalizations Related to Pressure Ulcers among Adults 18 Years and Older, 2006: Statistical Brief #64. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs
- 10.1097/01.ASW.0000425935.94874.41 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00016 · DOI
- 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182358968 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1553-7250(08)34014-8 · DOI
- 10.1097/00129334-200701000-00012 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Association of use of contract nurses with hospitalized patient pressure injuries and falls.
Ferguson, A., Bradywood, A., Williams, B., & Blackmore, C. C. (2020) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.12572 · Cited by 16
Increased Utilization of Overtime and Agency Nurses and Patient Safety
Pittman, P., Tiunn, H.-L., Luo, Q., Herron, M., Tatum, D., & Martin, J. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2875 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Aydin, C., Donaldson, N., Stotts, N. A., Fridman, M., & Brown, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- AMF Consulting, Inc. Los Angeles CA
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aydin, Carolyn
- Venue
- Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 351-373
- ISSN
- 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6773
- PMC
- PMC4369213
- OpenAlex
- W2060223623
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 13.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CDU eSpace Institutional Repository (Charles Darwin University) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- hospital-acquired pressure ulcers, pressure ulcer prevention, nursing workload, nursing expertise, risk assessment, medical-surgical units, length of hospital stay, patient characteristics
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Clinical Protocols, Pressure Ulcer, Female, Hospital Administration, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Quality of Health Care, Prevalence, Workload, Risk Assessment, Quality Indicators, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review