The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of measuring accruals as the change in successive balance sheet accounts, as opposed to measuring accruals directly from the statement of cash flows. Our primary finding is that studies using a balance sheet approach to test for earnings management are potentially contaminated by measurement error in accruals estimates. In particular, if the partitioning variable used to indicate the presence of earnings management is correlated with the occurrence of mergers and acquisitions or discontinued operations, tests are biased and researchers are likely to erroneously conclude that earnings management exists when there is none. Additional results show that the errors in balance sheet accruals estimation can confound returns regressions where discretionary and non‐discretionary accruals are used as explanatory variables. Moreover, we demonstrate that tests of market mispricing of accruals will be understated due to erroneous classification of “extreme” accruals firms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence of Earnings Management from the Provision for Bad Debts
McNichols, M., & Wilson, G. P. (1988) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2491176 · Cited by 919
Cited by
Costs of Equity and Earnings Attributes
Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M., & Schipper, K. (2004) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.967 · Cited by 2,377
Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness
Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001 · Cited by 2,372
Corporate Governance, Accounting Outcomes, and Organizational Performance
Larcker, D. F., Richardson, S. A., & Tuna, I. (2007) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2007.82.4.963 · Cited by 1,534
Accruals Quality and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Doyle, J. T., Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2007) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1141 · Cited by 1,366
The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors
Dichev, I. D., & Dechow, P. M. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.277231 · Cited by 1,119
Metadata
- Authors
- Hribar, P., & Collins, D. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-134
- ISSN
- 0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-679X
- OpenAlex
- W3124979649
- Cited by
- 1,681
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 194.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1475-679x.00041
- The paper
- Hribar, P., & Collins, D. W. (2002). Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research. Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.00041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.