Cited by 628EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Language Learning and Perfectionism: Anxious and Non‐Anxious Language Learners' Reactions to Their Own Oral Performance

Gregersen, Tammy, Horwitz, Elaine K.·2002·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

This interview study sought to clarify the relationship between foreign language anxiety and perfectionism. The comments of anxious and non‐anxious language learners were audiorecorded as they watched themselves interact in a videotaped oral interview. By examining the reactions of the language learners to their actual oral performance and analyzing the audiotapes for instances of perfectionism, evidence was gathered suggesting that anxious and non‐anxious learners differ in their personal performance standards, procrastination, fear of evaluation, and concern over errors. Because the results of this study indicated a link between language anxiety and perfectionism, the article ends with a discussion of procedures that have been used to overcome perfectionism and that may also be helpful to anxious foreign language learners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1540-4781.00161

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strong anxiety feelings are no doubt disruptive to behaviour, interfering with interpersonal communication, cognition and learning (Eysenck, 1979; Gregersen & Horwitz, 2002; MacIntyre & Gardner, 1994a, 1994b).

    “In terms of emotional effects, strong anxiety feelings are no doubt disruptive to behaviour, interfering with interpersonal communication, cognition and learning (Eysenck, 1979;Gregersen & Horwitz, 2002;MacIntyre & Gardner, 1994a, 1994b).”

    From The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom (2014) · cites this paper as Gregersen & Horwitz, 2002

  • Gregersen and Horwitz (2002) found that participants concerns regarding making mistakes because this might affect their positive image as a good learner.

    “In agreement with Gregersen and Horwitz (2002), the participants in the current study illustrated concerns regarding making mistakes because this might affect their positive image as a good learner.”

    From Triggers for Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety: Perceptions of Saudi EFL College Students (2024) · cites this paper as Gregersen and Horwitz (2002)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gregersen, T., & Horwitz, E. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Atacama (CL)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12
Volume
86
Issue
4
Pages
562-570
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W2121810576
Cited by
628
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 26
FWCI
17.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
foreign language anxiety, perfectionism, oral performance, self-monitoring, evaluation apprehension, procrastination, performance standards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review