The Roles of Context and Word Morphology in Learning New Kanji Words
Abstract
This study explores quantitative and qualitative differences between context and word morphology as determinants of students' guesses of the meanings of novel kanji compounds (i.e., words consisting of two or more Chinese characters). In this study, 74 Japanese language learners interpreted unknown compounds consisting of familiar characters under three conditions (i.e., words in isolation, contextual clues only, and both). When the students' guesses were compared against the actual meanings, context and word morphology were equally effective. However, the combined effect of both sources was the best, suggesting that the 2 sources provide information that does not overlap. Students expressed higher confidence in their context‐based guesses than in their words‐in‐isolation guesses. Furthermore, contextual clues generated more syntactically related guesses than did kanji clues, whereas kanji clues yielded more semantically related guesses than did context. In general, the strength of contextual support and morphological transparency worked additively when combined but sometimes affected each other negatively. These findings suggest that context and word morphology play different roles in word inference.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies on adult foreign language learners indicated that learners were most likely to make an accurate guess when they combined morphological and contextual information, but that lower-proficiency learners were likely to rely more on morphology and less on context.
“Studies on adult foreign language learners indicated that learners where most likely to make an accurate guess when they combined morphological and contextual information (Mori, 2003), but that lower-proficiency learners were likely to rely more on morphology and less on context (Hamada, 2014;Mori & Nagy, 1999).”
From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Mori, 2003
Cites
Learning Vocabulary in Another Language
Nation, I. S. P. (2001) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524759 · Cited by 6,608 · see citing works
Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading
Day, R. R., Omura, C., & Hiramatsu, M. (1991) · Reading in a Foreign Language · doi:10.64152/10125/67035 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2
Raudszus, H., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10122-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“…foreign language learners indicated that learners where most likely to make an accurate guess when they combined morphological and contextual information (Mori, 2003), but that lower-proficiency learners were likely to rely more on morphology and less on context (Hamada, 2014; Mori & Nagy, 1999).”
Background
- Authors
- Mori, Y.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mori, Yoshiko
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 404-420
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2070499717
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- kanji compounds, word morphology, context clues, Japanese as a second language, morphological transparency, learner confidence, Chinese characters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review