Cited by 42Second Language Acquisition and LearningReading and Literacy DevelopmentEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The Roles of Context and Word Morphology in Learning New Kanji Words

Mori, Yoshiko·2003·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

This study explores quantitative and qualitative differences between context and word morphology as determinants of students' guesses of the meanings of novel kanji compounds (i.e., words consisting of two or more Chinese characters). In this study, 74 Japanese language learners interpreted unknown compounds consisting of familiar characters under three conditions (i.e., words in isolation, contextual clues only, and both). When the students' guesses were compared against the actual meanings, context and word morphology were equally effective. However, the combined effect of both sources was the best, suggesting that the 2 sources provide information that does not overlap. Students expressed higher confidence in their context‐based guesses than in their words‐in‐isolation guesses. Furthermore, contextual clues generated more syntactically related guesses than did kanji clues, whereas kanji clues yielded more semantically related guesses than did context. In general, the strength of contextual support and morphological transparency worked additively when combined but sometimes affected each other negatively. These findings suggest that context and word morphology play different roles in word inference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1540-4781.00198

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on adult foreign language learners indicated that learners were most likely to make an accurate guess when they combined morphological and contextual information, but that lower-proficiency learners were likely to rely more on morphology and less on context.

    “Studies on adult foreign language learners indicated that learners where most likely to make an accurate guess when they combined morphological and contextual information (Mori, 2003), but that lower-proficiency learners were likely to rely more on morphology and less on context (Hamada, 2014;Mori & Nagy, 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mori, Y.
Affiliations
Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Mori, Yoshiko
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
404-420
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W2070499717
Cited by
42
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
kanji compounds, word morphology, context clues, Japanese as a second language, morphological transparency, learner confidence, Chinese characters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review