The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures
Abstract
Performance measurement is not an end in itself. So why should public managers measure performance? Because they may find such measures helpful in achieving eight specific managerial purposes. As part of their overall management strategy, public managers can use performance measures to evaluate, control, budget, motivate, promote, celebrate, learn, and improve. Unfortunately, no single performance measure is appropriate for all eight purposes. Consequently, public managers should not seek the one magic performance measure. Instead, they need to think seriously about the managerial purposes to which performance measurement might contribute and how they might deploy these measures. Only then can they select measures with the characteristics necessary to help achieve each purpose. Without at least a tentative theory about how performance measures can be employed to foster improvement (which is the core purpose behind the other seven), public managers will be unable to decide what should be measured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Outcome Bias in Decision Evaluation
Baron, J., & Hershey, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.569 · Cited by 873 · cited 1×
“…the evaluator will give higher marks when the outcome seems to validate the initial choice than when the outcome doesn't—even when the circumstances of the decision are precisely the same (Baron and Hershey 1988; Lipshitz 1989; Hawkins and Hastie 1990; Hershey and Baron 1992; Ghosh and Ray 2000).”
Background
Cited by
The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability
Busuioc, E. M., & Lodge, M. (2016) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12161 · Cited by 306
Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations: A literature review and research agenda
Piening, E. P. (2013) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.708358 · Cited by 270
van Loon, N., Kjeldsen, A. M., Andersen, L. B., Vandenabeele, W., & Leisink, P. (2018) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x16639111 · Cited by 113
(2013) · Cited by 96
Cepiku, D., Hinna, A., Scarozza, D., & Savignon, A. B. (2017) · Journal of Management & Governance · doi:10.1007/s10997-016-9371-3 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Behn, R. D.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-14
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 586-606
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2119040723
- Cited by
- 1,399
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 53.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1540-6210.00322
- The paper
- Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.