The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Corporate Diversification on Productivity
Abstract
Using plant‐level observations from the Longitudinal Research Database I show that conglomerates are more productive than stand‐alone firms at a given point in time. Dynamically, however, firms that diversify experience a net reduction in productivity. While the acquired plants increase productivity, incumbent plants suffer. Moreover, stock prices track firm productivity and this tracking is equally strong for diversified and stand‐alone firms. Therefore, lower transparency of conglomerates is unlikely to explain the discrepancy between productivity and stock prices on average. Finally, I offer some evidence that this discrepancy may arise because conglomerates dissipate rents in the form of higher wages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Core Competence of the Corporation
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2006) · Strategische Unternehmungsplanung — Strategische Unternehmungsführung · doi:10.1007/3-540-30763-x_14 · Cited by 11,433
Diversification's effect on firm value
Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(94)00798-6 · Cited by 3,061
Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance
Stulz, R. M. (1994) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261970 · Cited by 2,434
Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy
Demsetz, H. (1973) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466752 · Cited by 2,388
Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acquisitions?
MORCK, R., SHLEIFER, A., & VISHNY, R. W. (1990) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05079.x · Cited by 1,887
Internal Capital Markets and the Competition for Corporate Resources
STEIN, J. C. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03810.x · Cited by 1,777
The Cost of Diversity: The Diversification Discount and Inefficient Investment
Rajan, R., Servaes, H., & Zingales, L. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00200 · Cited by 1,683
Authority, Control, and the Distribution of Earnings
Rosen, S. (1982) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003456 · Cited by 1,202
Cash Flow and Investment: Evidence from Internal Capital Markets
LAMONT, O. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03809.x · Cited by 1,141
Are Internal capital Markets Efficient?
Shin, H.-H., & Stulz, R. M. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355398555676 · Cited by 1,048
Cited by
Syverson, C. (2011) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.49.2.326 · Cited by 2,942
Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market's reaction☆
MALMENDIER, U., & TATE, G. (2008) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002 · Cited by 2,754
Investor protection and equity markets
Shleifer, A., & Wolfenzon, D. (2002) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(02)00149-6 · Cited by 1,077
The Brain Gain of Corporate Boards: Evidence from China
GIANNETTI, M., LIAO, G., & YU, X. (2015) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12198 · Cited by 851
Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. L. (2005) · Handbook of Economic Growth · doi:10.1016/s1574-0684(05)01018-x · Cited by 708
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoar, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2379-2403
- ISSN
- 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6261
- OpenAlex
- W2124604198
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 89.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Corporate Diversification on Productivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1540-6261.00500
- The paper
- Schoar, A. (2002). Effects of Corporate Diversification on Productivity. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.