Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 596

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Presidential Puzzle: Political Cycles and the Stock Market

Open access
Santa‐Clara, Pedro, Valkanov, Rossen·2003·The Journal of Finance

Abstract

The excess return in the stock market is higher under Democratic than Republican presidencies: 9 percent for the value‐weighted and 16 percent for the equal‐weighted portfolio. The difference comes from higher real stock returns and lower real interest rates, is statistically significant, and is robust in subsamples. The difference in returns is not explained by business‐cycle variables related to expected returns, and is not concentrated around election dates. There is no difference in the riskiness of the stock market across presidencies that could justify a risk premium. The difference in returns through the political cycle is therefore a puzzle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1540-6261.00590

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 596

Metadata

Authors
Santa‐Clara, P., & Valkanov, R.
Venue
The Journal of Finance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-11
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
1841-1872
ISSN
  • 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6261
OpenAlex
W2107306255
Cited by
596
References
4
FWCI
18.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Presidential Puzzle: Political Cycles and the Stock Market. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1540-6261.00590
The paper
Santa‐Clara, P., & Valkanov, R. (2003). The Presidential Puzzle: Political Cycles and the Stock Market. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00590

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.