The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixture Models for Estimating the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Rates Vary among Individuals
Abstract
Summary We develop a parameterization of the beta‐binomial mixture that provides sensible inferences about the size of a closed population when probabilities of capture or detection vary among individuals. Three classes of mixture models (beta‐binomial, logistic‐normal, and latent‐class) are fitted to recaptures of snowshoe hares for estimating abundance and to counts of bird species for estimating species richness. In both sets of data, rates of detection appear to vary more among individuals (animals or species) than among sampling occasions or locations. The estimates of population size and species richness are sensitive to model‐specific assumptions about the latent distribution of individual rates of detection. We demonstrate using simulation experiments that conventional diagnostics for assessing model adequacy, such as deviance, cannot be relied on for selecting classes of mixture models that produce valid inferences about population size. Prior knowledge about sources of individual heterogeneity in detection rates, if available, should be used to help select among classes of mixture models that are to be used for inference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746
Cited by
Estimating Size and Composition of Biological Communities by Modeling the Occurrence of Species
Dorazio, R. M., & Royle, J. A. (2005) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214505000000015 · Cited by 567
Self-citationGENERALIZED SITE OCCUPANCY MODELS ALLOWING FOR FALSE POSITIVE AND FALSE NEGATIVE ERRORS
Royle, J. A., & Link, W. A. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[835:gsomaf]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 389
Link, W. A. (2003) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2003.00129.x · Cited by 301
Sample size in usability studies
Schmettow, M. (2012) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2133806.2133824 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorazio, R. M., & Andrew Royle, J.
- Venue
- Biometrics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 351-364
- ISSN
- 0006-341X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0420
- OpenAlex
- W2007144265
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixture Models for Estimating the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Rates Vary among Individuals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1541-0420.00042
- The paper
- Dorazio, R. M., & Andrew Royle, J. (2003). Mixture Models for Estimating the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Rates Vary among Individuals. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0420.00042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.