Cited by 407

Ultrasound‐assisted extraction and modification of plant‐based proteins: Impact on physicochemical, functional, and nutritional properties

Rahman, Md Mahfuzur, Lamsal, Buddhi P.·2021·Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety

Abstract

Ultrasonication is a green technology that has recently received an enormous research attention for extraction of plant‐based proteins and tailoring the functionalities of these ingredients. Ultrasonication is generally used as a pretreatment method in the conventional protein solubilization protocols because it can break the cell matrix to improve the extractability. The rate of protein extraction and increase in the extraction yields depend on operating conditions such as sonic energy density, time of sonication, the substrate to slurry ratio, agitation, and so on. Ultrasonication is also applied to modify the physical, structural, and functional properties of protein‐based ingredients, besides simultaneous extraction and modifications. Significant changes that occur in protein physical properties due to sonication include size reduction, rheology, electrical conductivity, and zeta (ζ) potential. These changes are due to cavitation‐induced shear leading to changes in secondary and tertiary structures, including protein aggregation and cross‐linking due to oxidation. Physical and structural changes affect the resulting ingredient functionality and nutritional quality of protein. Changes in the functional properties, especially hydrophobicity, solubility, emulsion, and foaming, depend on the extent of ultrasound energy applied to the protein. This study aims to review major ultrasound process parameters and conditions for extraction and modification of plant proteins and their impact on protein structural changes and resulting physicochemical, functional, and nutritional properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1541-4337.12709

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Rahman, M. M., & Lamsal, B. P.
Affiliations
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition Iowa State University Ames Iowa
Venue
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
1457-1480
ISSN
1541-4337
Cited by
407
References
0
Language
en
Funders
National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2018‐67017‐27560)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review