The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Scavenging Patterns of Feral Cats on Human Remains in an Outdoor Setting
Abstract
Two cases of feral cat (Felis catus) scavenging were documented at the Forensic Investigation Research Station in Whitewater, Colorado. Human remains at the facility are placed outside, observed daily, documented with field notes, and photographed; decomposition is scored on a Likert scale. Scavenger activity is monitored with game cameras. The cases documented included: preferential scavenging of the soft tissue of the shoulder and arm, differential consumption of tissue layers, superficial defects, and no macroscopic skeletal defects. This pattern more closely parallels the documented pattern of bobcat (Lynx rufus) scavenging than that of domestic cats. Scavenging among felids is relatively rare, as felids typically prefer to hunt. Such cases studied in detail are relatively few, spatially relative, and lack statistical robustness. While only two examples are reported here, these cases are rare overall, and this documentation may help field investigators understand the place of feral cats within a local scavenger guild.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“followed by Total Body Desiccation Score (TBDS) [48,89], Kelvin scale ADD (KADD) [42], and Accumulated De gree Minutes (ADM) [78].”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.02017.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00000433-199406000-00004 · DOI
- Sperhake JP, 2001, Postmortem animal depredation by a domestic cat, Arch Kriminol, 208, 114
- Suntirukpong A, 2017, Postmortem scavenging of human remains by domestic cats, Siriraj Med J, 69, 384
- Moran NC, 1992, Bones that cats gnawed upon: a case study in bone modification, Circaea, 9, 27
- 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00102-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00265-012-1384-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01169.x · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-813243-2.00005-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/zph.12488 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.029 · DOI
- 10.1111/1556-4029.14003 · DOI
- Baigent C, 2017, FIRS Technical Manual Series #3
- Baigent C, 2017, FIRS Technical Manual Series #1
- 10.1520/JFS2004017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/PAF.0b013e318187371f · DOI
- 10.1385/FSMP:1:1:037 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.022 · DOI
- Haglund WD, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains, 405
- Haglund WD, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains, 367
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.11.011 · DOI
- Synstelien JA, 2015, Studies in taphonomy: bone and soft tissue modifications by postmortem scavengers [dissertation]
- 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00112-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indra, L., Lösch, S., Errickson, D., & Finaughty, D. (2023) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111862 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcia, S., Smith, A., Baigent, C., & Connor, M.
- Affiliations
- Forensic Investigation Research Station Colorado Mesa University 1100 North Ave Grand Junction CO 81501 USA
- Colorado Mesa University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-11-08
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 948-952
- ISSN
- 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4029
- OpenAlex
- W2988169024
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- feral cats, cats, scavenging behavior, human remains, forensic taphonomy, scavenger guilds
- MeSH terms
- Body Remains, Aged, Animals, Animals, Wild, Cats, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Postmortem Changes, Forensic Anthropology, Forensic Pathology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review