Cited by 23Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Scavenging Patterns of Feral Cats on Human Remains in an Outdoor Setting

Garcia, Sara, Smith, Alexander, Baigent, Christiane, Connor, Melissa·2020·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

Two cases of feral cat (Felis catus) scavenging were documented at the Forensic Investigation Research Station in Whitewater, Colorado. Human remains at the facility are placed outside, observed daily, documented with field notes, and photographed; decomposition is scored on a Likert scale. Scavenger activity is monitored with game cameras. The cases documented included: preferential scavenging of the soft tissue of the shoulder and arm, differential consumption of tissue layers, superficial defects, and no macroscopic skeletal defects. This pattern more closely parallels the documented pattern of bobcat (Lynx rufus) scavenging than that of domestic cats. Scavenging among felids is relatively rare, as felids typically prefer to hunt. Such cases studied in detail are relatively few, spatially relative, and lack statistical robustness. While only two examples are reported here, these cases are rare overall, and this documentation may help field investigators understand the place of feral cats within a local scavenger guild.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1556-4029.14238

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.02017.x · DOI
  2. 10.1097/00000433-199406000-00004 · DOI
  3. Sperhake JP, 2001, Postmortem animal depredation by a domestic cat, Arch Kriminol, 208, 114
  4. Suntirukpong A, 2017, Postmortem scavenging of human remains by domestic cats, Siriraj Med J, 69, 384
  5. Moran NC, 1992, Bones that cats gnawed upon: a case study in bone modification, Circaea, 9, 27
  6. 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00102-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s00265-012-1384-6 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.10.011 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01169.x · DOI
  10. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813243-2.00005-1 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/zph.12488 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.029 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/1556-4029.14003 · DOI
  14. Baigent C, 2017, FIRS Technical Manual Series #3
  15. Baigent C, 2017, FIRS Technical Manual Series #1
  16. 10.1520/JFS2004017 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1097/PAF.0b013e318187371f · DOI
  18. 10.1385/FSMP:1:1:037 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.022 · DOI
  20. Haglund WD, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains, 405
  21. Haglund WD, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains, 367
  22. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.11.011 · DOI
  23. Synstelien JA, 2015, Studies in taphonomy: bone and soft tissue modifications by postmortem scavengers [dissertation]
  24. 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00112-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Garcia, S., Smith, A., Baigent, C., & Connor, M.
Affiliations
  • Forensic Investigation Research Station Colorado Mesa University 1100 North Ave Grand Junction CO 81501 USA
  • Colorado Mesa University (US)
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-08
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
948-952
ISSN
  • 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4029
OpenAlex
W2988169024
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
feral cats, cats, scavenging behavior, human remains, forensic taphonomy, scavenger guilds
MeSH terms
Body Remains, Aged, Animals, Animals, Wild, Cats, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Postmortem Changes, Forensic Anthropology, Forensic Pathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review