CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Legal processes and jurisprudenceLaw, Economics, and Judicial SystemsDeception detection and forensic psychology

Letter to the Editor—Do Court‐assessed Fees Induce Laboratory Contingency Bias in Crime Laboratories?

Koppl, Roger·2020·Journal of Forensic Sciences
DOI 10.1111/1556-4029.14545
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1556-4029.14545

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paying forensic laboratories only for convictions or rewarding forensic examiners for solving crimes but not for avoiding false convictions are one-sided and biased incentives to reach certain conclusions.

    “It is also important to consider how to minimize one-sided and biased incentives to reach certain conclusions, such as paying forensic laboratories only for convictions (Koppl, 2020) or rewarding forensic examiners for solving crimes but not for avoiding false convictions.”

    From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Koppl, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koppl, R.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Corresponding author
Koppl, Roger
ORCID
Koppl, Roger
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-20
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
1793-1794
ISSN
  • 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4029
DOI
10.1111/1556-4029.14545
OpenAlex
W3079668477
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
crime laboratories, forensic evidence evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review