Cited by 47Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPoisoning and overdose treatments

Brorphine—Investigation and quantitation of a new potent synthetic opioid in forensic toxicology casework using liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometr y

Krotulski, Alex J., Papsun, Donna M., Noble, Carolina, Kacinko, Sherri L., Logan, Barry K.·2021·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

New synthetic opioids continue to appear as novel psychoactive substances (NPS) on illicit drug markets. Isotonitazene emerged in mid‐2019, becoming the most prevalent NPS opioid in the United States within a few months. Notification by the Drug Enforcement Administration of its intent to schedule isotonitazene in mid‐2020 led to its decline in popularity and replacement with a new NPS opioid: brorphine. Brorphine is a potent synthetic opioid, but little information was previously available regarding its toxicity or involvement in impairment and death. Our laboratory developed an assay for the identification and quantitative confirmation of brorphine using standard addition. Quantitative analysis was performed using liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS). In vitro and in vivo metabolism studies were performed using pooled human liver microsomes and authentic biological specimens, respectively, with analysis by liquid chromatography quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (LC‐QTOF‐MS). Brorphine was confirmed in 20 authentic forensic cases, commonly found in combination with fentanyl (100%) and flualprazolam (80%). The average concentration of brorphine in blood was 2.5 ± 3.1 ng/mL (median: 1.1 ng/mL, range: 0.1–10 ng/mL). The average concentration of brorphine in urine was 4.6 ± 7.6 ng/mL (median: 1.6 ng/mL, range: 0.2–23 ng/mL). The majority of cases originated from Midwestern states. Metabolism was verified to included N‐dealkylation and hydroxylation. Detailed case histories and autopsy findings are presented herein. The prevalence of brorphine continues to increase in the United States. Forensic scientists should remain aware of the ongoing emergence of new opioids, especially those outside a standard scope of toxicology testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1556-4029.14623

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brorphine appeared on recreational drug markets around the globe from 2019 onwards and was also identified in (postmortem) toxicology samples.

    “Notably, brorphine appeared on recreational drug markets around the globe from 2019 onwards (Krotulski et al., 2020b; Ujváry et al., 2021; Vandeputte et al., 2022a; Verougstraete et al., 2020) and was also identified in (postmortem) toxicology samples (Krotulski et al., 2020a; Verougstraete et al., 2020; Vohra et al., 2021).”
  • More than 60 fatal and non-fatal case reports involving brorphine have been described.

    “More than 60 fatal and non-fatal case reports involving brorphine have been described (Grafinger et al., 2021; Krotulski et al., 2020a; Razinger et al., 2021; Verougstraete et al., 2020; Vohra et al., 2021; World Health Organization, 2021), underscoring the risks associated with its use.”
  • Brorphine is known to undergo N-dealkylation and hydroxylation in humans, with the N-dealkylated metabolite expected to be a common metabolite for the different analogues studied here.

    “Brorphine is known to undergo N -dealkylation and hydroxylation in humans (Grafinger et al., 2021; Krotulski et al., 2020a), with the N -dealkylated metabolite expected to be a common metabolite for the different analogues studied here (Krotulski et al., 2020a).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krotulski, A. J., Papsun, D. M., Noble, C., Kacinko, S. L., & Logan, B. K.
Affiliations
  • Fredric Rieders Family Foundation (US)
  • NMS Labs Horsham PA 19044 USA
Corresponding author
Krotulski, Alex J.
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-17
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
664-676
ISSN
  • 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4029
OpenAlex
W3100180555
Cited by
47
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
Keywords
synthetic opioids, new psychoactive substances, isotonitazene, forensic toxicology, drug metabolism, N-dealkylation, hydroxylation, fentanyl, postmortem toxicology
MeSH terms
Synthetic Drugs, Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Biotransformation, Chromatography, Liquid, Female, Humans, Imidazoles, Male, Middle Aged, Piperidines, Illicit Drugs, Molecular Structure, Forensic Toxicology, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review