The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acidobacterial community responses to agricultural management of soybean in Amazon forest soils
Open accessAbstract
This study focused on the impact of land-use changes and agricultural management of soybean in Amazon forest soils on the abundance and composition of the acidobacterial community. Quantitative real-time PCR (q-PCR) assays and pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene were applied to study the acidobacterial community in bulk soil samples from soybean croplands and adjacent native forests, and mesocosm soil samples from soybean rhizosphere. Based on qPCR measurements, Acidobacteria accounted for 23% in forest soils, 18% in cropland soils, and 14% in soybean rhizosphere of the total bacterial signals. From the 16S rRNA gene sequences of Bacteria domain, the phylum Acidobacteria represented 28% of the sequences from forest soils, 16% from cropland soils, and 17% from soybean rhizosphere. Acidobacteria subgroups 1-8, 10, 11, 13, 17, 18, 22, and 25 were detected with subgroup 1 as dominant among them. Subgroups 4, 6, and 7 were significantly higher in cropland soils than in forest soils, which subgroups responded to decrease in soil aluminum. Subgroups 6 and 7 responded to high content of soil Ca, Mg, Mn, and B. These results showed a differential response of the Acidobacteria subgroups to abiotic soil factors, and open the possibilities to explore acidobacterial subgroups as early-warning bioindicators of agricultural soil management effects in the Amazon area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00335-09 · Cited by 4,063
Jones, R. T., Robeson, M. S., Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.127 · Cited by 1,230
Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon
Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Shimabukuro, Y. E., Anderson, L. O., Arai, E., del Bon Espirito-Santo, F., Freitas, R., & Morisette, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0606377103 · Cited by 1,081
Cited by
The ecology of Acidobacteria: moving beyond genes and genomes
Kielak, A. M., Barreto, C. C., Kowalchuk, G. A., van Veen, J. A., & Kuramae, E. E. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00744 · Cited by 1,033
Self-citationOrganic nitrogen rearranges both structure and activity of the soil-borne microbial seedbank
Leite, M. F. A., Pan, Y., Bloem, J., Berge, H. T., & Kuramae, E. E. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42634 · Cited by 63
Self-citationImpact of Next-Generation Sequencing Technology in Plant–Microbe Interaction Study
Kumari, A., Sumer, S., Jalan, B., Nongbri, P. L., & Laskar, M. A. (2017) · Microbial Applications Vol.1 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52666-9_13 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Navarrete, A. A., Kuramae, E. E., de Hollander, M., Pijl, A. S., van Veen, J. A., & Tsai, S. M.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-10-19
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 607-621
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046336071
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
