Social media, socialization, and pursuing legitimation of police violence*
Abstract
Abstract Every day, police departments across America are executing stops, summonses, arrests, and increasingly, tweeting. Although scholarship has focused on how social media democratizes news production and information sharing for activist movements, it has yet to explore how police leverage these attributes to advance institutional interests. I argue that, beyond digital surveillance or community engagement, social media provides police with the technological capacity to pursue both daily socialization of online audiences to their worldview and legitimation in the aftermath of contested police violence. I provide evidence by adopting a qualitative approach to “big data” sources analyzing 1) all 3,167 tweets posted by the New York Police Department in 2018; 2) the 778 Twitter replies to their most contested fatal shooting that year; and 3) a sample of 139 news articles covering this shooting over a year afterward. As public scrutiny toward police intensifies, social media represents an independent channel for police to publicize information unfiltered by traditional mass media. These findings have implications for police accountability and the episodes of police violence that do—and do not—elevate into national controversies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social media platforms facilitate 'selective transparency' by the police, allowing them to strategically release and withhold information about officer wrongdoing that furthers police narratives.
“social media platforms facilitate 'selective transparency' by”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Cheng, 2021
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
Incidents of police misconduct and public opinion
Weitzer, R. (2002) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/s0047-2352(02)00150-2 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
“Code of the Tweet: Urban Gang Violence in the Social Media Age.”
Stuart, F. (2020) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spz010 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Police legitimacy regimes and the suppression of citizen oversight in response to police violence
Rocha Beardall, T. (2022) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12321 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
The epistemic power of the police
Boutros, M. (2024) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/13624806241263916 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cheng, T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cheng, Tony
- ORCID
- Cheng, Tony
- Venue
- Criminology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-418
- ISSN
- 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9125
- OpenAlex
- W3196286088
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15
- FWCI
- 24.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Keywords
- police social media, police legitimacy, police brutality, New York City Police Department, Twitter, police accountability, police shootings, institutional communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review