Cited by 44Policing Practices and PerceptionsSocial Media and PoliticsPublic Relations and Crisis Communication

Social media, socialization, and pursuing legitimation of police violence*

Cheng, Tony·2021·Criminology

Abstract

Abstract Every day, police departments across America are executing stops, summonses, arrests, and increasingly, tweeting. Although scholarship has focused on how social media democratizes news production and information sharing for activist movements, it has yet to explore how police leverage these attributes to advance institutional interests. I argue that, beyond digital surveillance or community engagement, social media provides police with the technological capacity to pursue both daily socialization of online audiences to their worldview and legitimation in the aftermath of contested police violence. I provide evidence by adopting a qualitative approach to “big data” sources analyzing 1) all 3,167 tweets posted by the New York Police Department in 2018; 2) the 778 Twitter replies to their most contested fatal shooting that year; and 3) a sample of 139 news articles covering this shooting over a year afterward. As public scrutiny toward police intensifies, social media represents an independent channel for police to publicize information unfiltered by traditional mass media. These findings have implications for police accountability and the episodes of police violence that do—and do not—elevate into national controversies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1745-9125.12277

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media platforms facilitate 'selective transparency' by the police, allowing them to strategically release and withhold information about officer wrongdoing that furthers police narratives.

    “social media platforms facilitate 'selective transparency' by”

    From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Cheng, 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, T.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Tony
Venue
Criminology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
391-418
ISSN
  • 0011-1384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9125
OpenAlex
W3196286088
Cited by
44
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15
FWCI
24.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
police social media, police legitimacy, police brutality, New York City Police Department, Twitter, police accountability, police shootings, institutional communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review