Cited by 107Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

Reducing Inmate Misconduct and Prison Returns with Facility Education Programs

Pompoco, Amanda, Wooldredge, John, Lugo, Melissa, Sullivan, Carrie, Latessa, Edward J.·2017·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary Participants and nonparticipants in Ohio prison education programs were compared in rates of misconduct during incarceration and prison returns after release. Propensity score matching was used to compare male nonparticipants with males who completed or started but did not complete GEDs, vocational training/apprenticeship programs, and college classes (each education group examined separately). More than 92,000 males were eligible for study, reflecting all men admitted to Ohio prisons between January 2008 and June 2012. Inmates who earned GEDs or completed college classes were less likely than nonprogram inmates to engage in violence during incarceration, whereas completing vocational training and apprenticeship programs had no such effect on any type of inmate misconduct examined. On the other hand, completing vocational training and apprenticeship programs, GEDs, or college classes at any point during incarceration coincided with lower rates of prison returns within 3 years after release. None of these benefits accrued to inmates who started but did not complete these programs/classes. Policy Implications The provision of GED programs and college classes to prison inmates may help to reduce levels of violence during incarceration, thus, providing safer facility environments for both inmates and staff. GED programs, college classes, and vocational training/apprenticeship programs may also help offenders to refrain from returning to prison, perhaps by providi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1745-9133.12290

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pompoco, A., Wooldredge, J., Lugo, M., Sullivan, C., & Latessa, E. J.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Pompoco, Amanda
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2017-05
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
515-547
ISSN
  • 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9133
OpenAlex
W2619332873
Cited by
107
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4
FWCI
25.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
prison education programs, prison misconduct, recidivism, prison violence, GED programs, vocational education, apprenticeship programs, program completion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review