Reducing Inmate Misconduct and Prison Returns with Facility Education Programs
Abstract
Research Summary Participants and nonparticipants in Ohio prison education programs were compared in rates of misconduct during incarceration and prison returns after release. Propensity score matching was used to compare male nonparticipants with males who completed or started but did not complete GEDs, vocational training/apprenticeship programs, and college classes (each education group examined separately). More than 92,000 males were eligible for study, reflecting all men admitted to Ohio prisons between January 2008 and June 2012. Inmates who earned GEDs or completed college classes were less likely than nonprogram inmates to engage in violence during incarceration, whereas completing vocational training and apprenticeship programs had no such effect on any type of inmate misconduct examined. On the other hand, completing vocational training and apprenticeship programs, GEDs, or college classes at any point during incarceration coincided with lower rates of prison returns within 3 years after release. None of these benefits accrued to inmates who started but did not complete these programs/classes. Policy Implications The provision of GED programs and college classes to prison inmates may help to reduce levels of violence during incarceration, thus, providing safer facility environments for both inmates and staff. GED programs, college classes, and vocational training/apprenticeship programs may also help offenders to refrain from returning to prison, perhaps by providi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Kim, R. H., & Clark, D. (2013) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.03.001 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Safety First! Residential Group Climate and Antisocial Behavior: A Multilevel Meta-analysis
E. M. A, E., J. J, R., G. H. P, V. D. H., E. J. E, H., C. H. Z, K., K. S, N., S, V., J. D, L., G. J. J. M, S., E, K., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x241252052 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“In addition, residential rehabilitation programs can decrease re-offending rates among formerly incarcerated offenders (see e.g., Lipsey, 2009; Pompoco et al., 2017; Van Stam et al., 2014).”
- Authors
- Pompoco, A., Wooldredge, J., Lugo, M., Sullivan, C., & Latessa, E. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pompoco, Amanda
- ORCID
- Wooldredge, John
- Venue
- Criminology & Public Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 515-547
- ISSN
- 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9133
- OpenAlex
- W2619332873
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 25.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- prison education programs, prison misconduct, recidivism, prison violence, GED programs, vocational education, apprenticeship programs, program completion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review