The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strengthening Cybersecurity of Water Infrastructure through Legislative Actions
Abstract
Many water and wastewater utilities are vulnerable to cyberattacks and cyber intrusions. The COVID‐19 pandemic has exacerbated this weakness by moving water‐related employees to remote work, which has increased vulnerability to cyber threats. However, policymakers recognize the need to strengthen the cybersecurity resilience of water infrastructure, as evidenced by legislative activity. This article reviews four cases of recently adopted cybersecurity legislation at the federal and state levels. The empirical focus is on (1) the America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, (2) the Internet of Things Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2020, (3) the New Jersey Water Quality Accountability Act, and (4) the New York Water Supply Emergency Plans. The legislative review recapitulates the core components of these legislative efforts to amplify strategies for securing and improving water infrastructure.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The study found that the new legislative efforts have created more awareness and funding to enhance cybersecurity, but the implementation still faces enormous challenges, especially to smaller utilities with less technical and financial capability.”
From Cyber-Physical Risk Assessment for U.S. Water Utilities: A Comprehensive Analysis of SCADA and Operational Technology Vulnerabilities (2025) · cites this paper as You (2022)
Citations
Cites
Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security
Stouffer, K., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Abrams, M., & Hahn, A. (2015) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-82r2 · Cited by 1,377 · cited 3×
“…are as follows: (1) the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s special publication titled “Guide to Industrial Control Systems Security” (Stouffer et al. 2015) and the International Electrotechnical Commission 62443 industrial cybersecurity standards (International Society of…”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1111/wej.12340 · DOI
- 10.5942/jawwa.2017.109.0021 · DOI · Paper page
- Dragos.2021. “ICS Cybersecurity Year in Review 2020.”https://www.dragos.com/year‐in‐review.
- Fagan M., 2021, IoT Device Cybersecurity Guidance for the Federal Government: Establishing IoT Device Cybersecurity Requirements (NIST Special Publication 800–213)
- 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001686 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2172/1505628 · DOI
- Montgomery M., 2021, Poor Cybersecurity Makes Water a Weak Link in Critical Infrastructure
- 10.1002/awwa.1466 · DOI
- 10.1109/MSMC.2018.2885984 · DOI
Cited by
Aniebonam, S. O., & Aniebonam, C. P. (2025) · Journal of Environment, Climate, and Ecology · doi:10.69739/jece.v2i1.1031 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- You, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Corresponding author
- You, Jongeun
- ORCID
- You, Jongeun
- Venue
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-02-25
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 282-288
- ISSN
- 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1688
- OpenAlex
- W4214607795
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
- Keywords
- cybersecurity law, water infrastructure, water utilities, cyberattacks, cyber resilience, remote work, COVID-19 pandemic, federal and state legislation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
