The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in the 40 to 80 year‐old population in Yazd, Iran: The Yazd Eye Study 伊朗亚兹德省40至80岁人群的糖尿病视网膜病变患病率以及危险因素：亚兹德眼病研究
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 8% prevalence of referable DR mirrors the real-world scenario within the Lifeline Express Program, while the 4% prevalence was chosen based on data from high-income countries and the 12% prevalence was based on data from other LMICs.
“The 8% prevalence mirrors the real-world scenario within the Lifeline Express Program, while the lower prevalence of 4% was chosen based on data from high-income countries55,56, and the higher prevalence of 12% was based on data from other LMICs57–59.”
From Economic evaluation for medical artificial intelligence: accuracy vs. cost-effectiveness in a diabetic retinopathy screening case (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
The study simulated prevalences of referable DR of 4%, 8%, and 12% to reflect global variations.
“To accommodate different DR screening settings, we simulated at WTP levels ranging from US$ 0 to 30,828, and different prevalences of referable DR (4%, 8%, and 12%) to reflect the global variations.”
From Economic evaluation for medical artificial intelligence: accuracy vs. cost-effectiveness in a diabetic retinopathy screening case (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1080/09286580701396720 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.eye.6701476 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301874 · DOI
- Azizi F, 2003, The diabetes prevention and control programme of the Islamic Republic of Iran, East Mediterr Health J, 9, 1114, 10.26719/2003.9.5-6.1114 · DOI
- 10.3109/09286586.2012.744844 · DOI
- 1991, Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs–an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group, Ophthalmology, 98, 786, 10.1016/S0161-6420(13)38012-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00475-5 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2458-8-176 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2415-9-12 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Y., Liu, C., Hu, W., Luo, L., Shi, D., Zhang, J., Yin, Q., Zhang, L., Han, X., & He, M. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01032-9 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Dehghan, M. H., Katibeh, M., Ahmadieh, H., Nourinia, R., & Yaseri, M.
- Affiliations
- Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Katibeh, Marzieh
- Venue
- Journal of Diabetes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-141
- ISSN
- 1753-0393 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-0407
- OpenAlex
- W1487596739
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- diabetic retinopathy, prevalence, risk factors, older adults, diabetic eye disease
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Iran, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
