Cited by 31Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningBrain Metastases and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Trends in incidence of primary brain cancer in New Zealand, 1995 to 2010

Open access
J‐H Kim, Stella, Ioannides, Sally J., Elwood, J. Mark·2015·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Case-control studies have linked mobile phone use to an increased risk of glioma in the most exposed brain areas, the temporal and parietal lobes, although inconsistently. We examined time trends in the incidence rates of brain malignancies in New Zealand from 1995 to 2010. METHODS: Data from the New Zealand Cancer Registry was used to calculate incidence rates of primary brain cancer, by age, gender, morphology and anatomical site. Log-linear regression analysis was used to assess trends in the annual incidence of primary brain cancer; annual percentage changes and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated. RESULTS: No consistent increases in all primary brain cancer, glioma, or temporal or parietal lobe glioma were seen. At ages 10-69, the incidence of all brain cancers declined significantly. Incidence of glioma increased at ages over 70. CONCLUSION: In New Zealand, there has been no consistent increase in incidence rates of primary brain cancers. An increase in glioma at ages over 70 is likely to be due to improvements in diagnosis. As with any such studies, a small effect, or one with a latent period of more than 10 to 15 years, cannot be excluded.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1753-6405.12338

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 2010, Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: Results of the INTERPHONE international case‐control study, Int J Epidemiol, 39, 675, 10.1093/ije/dyq079 · DOI
  2. Deltour, 2012, Mobile phone use and incidence of glioma in the Nordic countries 1979–2008: Consistency check, Epidemiology, 23, 301, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182448295 · DOI
  3. Deltour, 2009, Time trends in brain tumor incidence rates in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, 1974–2003, J Natl Cancer Inst, 101, 1721, 10.1093/jnci/djp415 · DOI
  4. Hardell, 2009, Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours, Int J Oncol, 35, 5, 10.3892/ijo_00000307 · DOI
  5. Lonn, 2004, Incidence trends of adult primary intracerebral tumors in four Nordic countries, Int J Cancer, 108, 450, 10.1002/ijc.11578 · DOI
  6. Inskip, 2010, Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States, Neuro Oncol, 12, 1147, 10.1093/neuonc/noq077 · DOI
  7. Muscat, 2006, Mobile telephones and rates of brain cancer, Neuroepidemiology, 27, 55, 10.1159/000094381 · DOI
  8. de Vocht, 2011, Time trends (1998–2007) in brain cancer incidence rates in relation to mobile phone use in England, Bioelectromagnetics, 32, 334, 10.1002/bem.20648 · DOI
  9. Nomura, 2011, Trends in the incidence of primary intracranial tumors in Osaka, Japan, Jpn J Clin Oncol, 41, 291, 10.1093/jjco/hyq204 · DOI
  10. Dobes, 2011, A multicenter study of primary brain tumor incidence in Australia (2000–2008), Neuro Oncol, 13, 783, 10.1093/neuonc/nor052 · DOI
  11. Dobes, 2011, Increasing incidence of glioblastoma multiforme and meningioma, and decreasing incidence of Schwannoma (2000–2008): Findings of a multicenter Australian study, Surg Neurol Int, 2, 176, 10.4103/2152-7806.90696 · DOI
  12. Cook, 2003, Cellular telephone use and time trends for brain, head and neck tumours, N Z Med J, 116, U457
  13. Cardis, 2008, Distribution of RF energy emitted by mobile phones in anatomical structures of the brain, Phys Med Biol, 53, 2771, 10.1088/0031-9155/53/11/001 · DOI
  14. Little, 2012, Mobile phone use and glioma risk: Comparison of epidemiological study results with incidence trends in the United States, Br Med J, 344, e1147, 10.1136/bmj.e1147 · DOI
  15. Ding, 2011, Increasing incidence of brain and nervous tumours in urban Shanghai, China, 1983–2007, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 3319
  16. Bondy, 2008, Brain tumor epidemiology: Consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium, Cancer, 113, 1953, 10.1002/cncr.23741 · DOI
  17. Braganza, 2012, Ionizing radiation and the risk of brain and central nervous system tumors: A systematic review, Neuro Oncol, 14, 1316, 10.1093/neuonc/nos208 · DOI
  18. Rajaraman, 2012, Genome‐wide association study of glioma and meta‐analysis, Hum Genet, 131, 1877, 10.1007/s00439-012-1212-0 · DOI
  19. Linos, 2007, Atopy and risk of brain tumors: a meta‐analysis, J Natl Cancer Inst, 99, 1544, 10.1093/jnci/djm170 · DOI
  20. Kitahara, 2014, Personal history of diabetes, genetic susceptibility to diabetes, and risk of brain glioma: A pooled analysis of observational studies, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 23, 47, 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0913 · DOI
  21. Kitahara, 2014, A prospective study of height and body mass index in childhood, birth weight, and risk of adult glioma over 40 years of follow‐up, Am J Epidemiol, 180, 821, 10.1093/aje/kwu203 · DOI
  22. Braganza, 2014, Cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, and risk of glioma in the NIH‐AARP Diet and Health Study, Br J Cancer, 110, 242, 10.1038/bjc.2013.611 · DOI
  23. Lutz, 1994, Trends in primary cerebral lymphoma, Br J Cancer, 70, 716, 10.1038/bjc.1994.381 · DOI
  24. Pirouzmand, 2007, The incidence trends of primary brain tumors in Saskatchewan from 1970 to 2001, Can J Neurol Sci, 34, 181, 10.1017/S0317167100006016 · DOI
  25. Preston‐Martin, 1993, Descriptive epidemiology of primary cancer of the brain, cranial nerves, and cranial meninges in New Zealand, 1948–88, Cancer Causes Control, 4, 529
  26. Shugg, 1994, Brain cancer incidence, mortality and case survival: Observations from two Australian cancer registries, Int J Cancer, 59, 765, 10.1002/ijc.2910590610 · DOI
  27. Keene, 1999, Brain tumors in childhood and adolescence, Pediatr Neurol, 20, 198, 10.1016/S0887-8994(98)00139-8 · DOI
  28. Radhakrishnan, 1995, The trends in incidence of primary brain tumors in the population of Rochester, Minnesota, Ann Neurol, 37, 67, 10.1002/ana.410370113 · DOI
  29. Helseth, 1995, The incidence of primary central nervous system neoplasms before and after computerized tomography availability, J Neurosurg, 83, 999, 10.3171/jns.1995.83.6.0999 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
J‐H Kim, S., Ioannides, S. J., & Elwood, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
148-152
ISSN
1326-0200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025906509
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Brain Metastases and Treatment
Keywords
glioma, incidence trends, temporal lobe glioma, mobile phone use, age-specific incidence, New Zealand
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Brain Neoplasms, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Glioma, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Radio Waves, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review