Cited by 30Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsEthics in Clinical ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are there systematic barriers to participation in cancer treatment trials by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer patients in Australia?

Open access
Cunningham, Joan, Garvey, Gail·2021·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that may systematically reduce opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians to participate in cancer clinical trials. METHODS: Analysis of online documents from the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry for cancer treatment trials (Phase 3, 4 or Not Applicable) with at least one Australian site, registered in 2014-2018. RESULTS: Among 365 eligible trials, most (89%) had sites only in major cities/inner regional areas, but 39% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians live outside these areas. Seven cancer types accounted for 58% of cancers among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, but only 46% of trials addressed these cancers. Most trials specified exclusions relating to comorbidities/health status. A substantial minority of trials (38%) explicitly referred to investigator opinion/judgment as a relevant determinant of patient eligibility. CONCLUSION: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients appear to have a reduced opportunity to participate in trials because of where they live, their type of cancer and their general health status, as well as for less transparent reasons relating to investigator judgment. Implications for public health: Greater transparency and greater scrutiny of barriers to trial participation for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians are needed to ensure equitable access.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1753-6405.13059

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sabesan, 2019, An introduction to the Australasian Teletrial Model, Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol., 15, 3

Cited by

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Cunningham, J., & Garvey, G.
Affiliations
Menzies School of Health Research (AU)
Corresponding author
Cunningham, Joan
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
39-45
ISSN
1326-0200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3113868457
Cited by
30
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (1153027, 1176651, 1058244)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, cancer clinical trials, barriers to clinical trial participation, health equity, inclusion and exclusion criteria, cancer types
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, Adult, Antineoplastic Agents, Australia, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Health Status, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, New Zealand, Referral and Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are there systematic barriers to participation in cancer treatment trials by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer patients in Australia? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1753-6405.13059
The paper
Cunningham, J., & Garvey, G. (2021). Are there systematic barriers to participation in cancer treatment trials by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer patients in Australia? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13059