The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two new inflammatory markers associated with Disease Activity Score‐28 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio and platelet‐lymphocyte ratio
Abstract
Aim: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease with unknown etiology and systemic involvement. Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are two new inflammatory markers used in the assessment of systemic inflammation. The aim here is to study NLR and PLR in patients with RA to investigate their relation with Disease Activity Score of 28 joints (DAS‐28). Methods: The study included 104 patients with RA and a control group of 51 age‐ and gender‐matched healthy subjects. We divided the patients into two groups according to the DAS‐28 score. Group 1 included patients with a score of lower than 2.6 by the DAS‐28 (patients in remission) and Group 2 included patients with a score of 2.6 and higher (patients with active disease). Results: NLR was 2.12 ± 0.83 in the patient group and 1.58 ± 0.57 in the control group. PLR was 136.50 ± 53.52 in the patient group and 114.84 ± 29.41 in the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in NLR and PLR between the patient and control groups (P ≤ 0.0001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Patients in Group 1 had an NLR of 1.84 ± 0.61 and a PLR of 119.25 ± 41.77. Patients in Group 2 had an NLR of 2.29 ± 0.90 and a PLR of 147.28 ± 56.96. There was a statistically significant difference in NLR and PLR between the two groups (P = 0.003 and P = 0.005 respectively). A correlation was observed between NLR and PLR by DAS‐28 (r = 0.345, P ≤ 0.0001 and r = 0.352, P ≤ 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions: The present study showed us that NLR and PLR were two new inflammatory markers which could be used to assess disease activity in patients with RA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The diagnostic and predictive role of NLR, d-NLR and PLR in COVID-19 patients
Yang, A.-P., Liu, J.-P., Tao, W.-Q., & Li, H.-M. (2020) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106504 · Cited by 1,138
The Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Inflammatory Marker in Rheumatic Diseases
Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L., Mukanova, U., Yessirkepov, M., & Kitas, G. D. (2019) · Annals of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.3343/alm.2019.39.4.345 · Cited by 607
Chandrashekara, S., Mukhtar Ahmad, M., Renuka, P., Anupama, K. R., & Renuka, K. (2017) · International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1111/1756-185x.13157 · Cited by 112
Mathur, K., Kurbanova, N., & Qayyum, R. (2019) · Platelets · doi:10.1080/09537104.2019.1571188 · Cited by 55
Seckin, B., Ates, M. C., Kirbas, A., & Yesilyurt, H. (2021) · International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health · doi:10.1515/ijamh-2018-0078 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Uslu, A. U., Küçük, A., Şahin, A., Ugan, Y., Yılmaz, R., Güngör, T., Bağcacı, S., & Küçükşen, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-21
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 731-735
- ISSN
- 1756-1841 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2052783235
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two new inflammatory markers associated with Disease Activity Score‐28 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio and platelet‐lymphocyte ratio. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1756-185x.12582
- The paper
- Uslu, A. U., Küçük, A., Şahin, A., Ugan, Y., Yılmaz, R., Güngör, T., Bağcacı, S., & Küçükşen, S. (2015). Two new inflammatory markers associated with Disease Activity Score‐28 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio and platelet‐lymphocyte ratio. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.12582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.