Does multimarket contact facilitate tacit collusion? Inference on conduct parameters in the airline industry
Open accessAbstract
We provide empirical evidence that multimarket contact facilitates tacit collusion among airlines using a flexible model of oligopolistic behavior, where conduct parameters are modelled as functions of multimarket contact. We find (i) carriers with little multimarket contact do not cooperate in setting fares, whereas carriers serving many markets simultaneously sustain almost perfect coordination; (ii) cross‐price elasticities play a crucial role in determining the impact of multimarket contact on equilibrium fares; (iii) marginal changes in multimarket contact matter only at low or moderate levels of contact; (iv) assuming firms behave as Bertrand‐Nash competitors leads to biased estimates of marginal costs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a positive and highly statistically significant effect of multi-market contact on ticket prices.
“Table 4, specification (7) shows that there is a positive and highly statistically significant effect of multi-market contact on ticket prices, measured as average route contact as in in Evans and Kessides (1994); see Ciliberto and Williams (2014) for a structural version.”
From Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership (2018) · cites this paper as Ciliberto and Williams (2014)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership
AZAR, J., SCHMALZ, M. C., & TECU, I. (2018) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12698 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Do increasing markups matter? Lessons from empirical industrial organization
Berry, S., Gaynor, M., & Morton, F. S. (2019) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.33.3.44 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ciliberto, F., & Williams, J. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Jonathan W.
- Venue
- The RAND Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-29
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 764-791
- ISSN
- 0741-6261 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-2171
- OpenAlex
- W2623366082
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 20.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- The RAND Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- repository of the Library and Information Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (REAL-J) (acceptedVersion)
- Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Transport and Economic Policies
- Keywords
- tacit collusion, multimarket contact, airline industry, oligopoly, conduct parameter, fare setting, cross-price elasticity, marginal cost estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review