Cited by 1Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsPlant Disease Management Techniques

Soil Allies: Exploring the Combined Potential of Folsomia candida and Trichoderma spp. Against Fusarium oxysporum

Open access
Santos‐Barbosa, Juan Carlos, Molina, Jorge, Rodríguez‐Bocanegra, María X.·2025·Environmental Microbiology Reports

Abstract

Fusarium oxysporum is a widespread phytopathogenic fungus that affects a variety of crops worldwide. This study evaluated the independent effects of three species of Trichoderma ( T. harzianum , T. viride , and T. longibrachiatum ) and the springtail Folsomia candida on the suppression of F. oxysporum under laboratory conditions. We conducted separate in vitro assays to assess fungal antagonism and feeding preferences of the springtail. The results demonstrated that all Trichoderma species significantly inhibited F. oxysporum growth, whilst F. candida showed a marked preference for consuming F. oxysporum mycelium over that of the tested Trichoderma species. These findings suggest that both organisms may contribute to the reduction of F. oxysporum independently. This preliminary work lays the foundation for future studies investigating potential interactions and combined biocontrol applications under more complex and ecological settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1758-2229.70202

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 1

Authors
Santos‐Barbosa, J. C., Molina, J., & Rodríguez‐Bocanegra, M. X.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
  • Department of Microbiology Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA), Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotá Colombia
Corresponding author
Molina, Jorge
Venue
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-09-29
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
e70202-e70202
ISSN
1758-2229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414675473
Cited by
1
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Microbiology Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Management Techniques
Keywords
Fusarium oxysporum, Trichoderma, Folsomia candida, Collembola, biological control, fungal antagonism, plant pathogenic fungi, Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma viride, Trichoderma longibrachiatum, feeding preference
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibiosis, Arthropods, Fusarium, Plant Diseases, Soil Microbiology, Trichoderma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review