The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The 21st century trust and leadership problem: Quoi faire?
Open accessAbstract
Much of the democratic world faces a form of socio‐political crisis. To varying degrees, four trends seem to be present in almost every case: declining institutional trust, failing leadership, increasing political polarisation, and weakened accountability. Although each trend has its own dynamic and causes, they jointly create complex challenges and governance problems for democratic societies. Furthermore, underlying them all is the persistent problem of inequality, which erodes trust, prevents the best leaders from rising to the top, polarises society, and shields elites from accountability. We propose a wide range of potential solutions to this crisis. Of the four, we propose that countries focus primarily on increasing institutional trust and improving leadership potential. Both aspects are particularly impactful and malleable, could influence the other two components and, over time, create a virtuous cycle pulling countries out of crisis. Proposed measures for institutional trust include expanded civic literacy, more expansive regulation of tech platforms, stricter media laws to foster better public discourse and a wider use of codes of conduct. For leadership, we propose more diverse channels and expanded selection pools for leadership recruitment, emphasising ethical conviction and targeted incentives for leadership roles. Essential to all of them, however, is tackling inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1257/aer.20172043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13504850701720197 · DOI
- 10.1515/npf‐2019‐0041 · DOI
- 10.5018/economics‐ejournal.ja.2019‐8 · DOI
- Applebaum A., 2020, Twilight of democracy: the seductive lure of authoritarianism
- Boxell L. Gentzkow M.&Shapiro J.(2021)Cross‐country trends in affective polarization: working paper 26669. NBER Working Papers. · DOI · Paper page
- Cuellar R., 2009, Social cohesion and democracy
- Dalton R.J., 2005, The social transformation of trust in government, World Values Survey, 15, 133
- 10.1353/jod.2015.0009 · DOI
- Dyer P., 2021, Policy and institutional responses to COVID‐19: South Korea
- Eatwell R., 2018, National populism: the revolt against Liberal democracy
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561747 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540‐6210.2010.02161.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.16997/book24 · DOI
- Fukuyama F., 1995, Trust: social virtues and the creation of prosperity
- Fukuyama F., 2019, Identity: contemporary identity politics and the struggle for recognition
- 10.2307/j.ctt7s1jn · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.n1540 · DOI
- Jordahl H., 2007, Handbook of social capital
- 10.1525/gp.2020.17639 · DOI
- Keeter S., 2021, Americans' trust in government, each other, leaders
- Kelton S., 2020, The deficit myth: modern monetary theory and the birth of the people's economy
- 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100523 · DOI · Paper page
- Levitsky S., 2018, How democracies die
- Linz J., 1978, The breakdown of democratic regimes: crisis, breakdown and reequilibration: an introduction
- 10.1017/gov.2021.24 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540‐6237.2012.00864.x · DOI
- 10.1177/000276421875957 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-77602-2_10 · DOI
- Mudde C., 2019, The far right today
- 10.9783/9780812293784 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/jod.2006.0050 · DOI
- 10.1787/9789264308992-en · DOI
- 10.1787/52600c9e-en · DOI
- OECD, 2022, Trust in government
- 10.18356/ede38028-en · DOI
- Pew Research Center, 2021, Public trust in government: 1958–2021
- Piketty T., 2021, Time for socialism: dispatches from a world on fire, 2016–2021
- 10.1017/9781108671019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.24874/IJQR15.01-02 · DOI
- United Nations, 2021, Sustainable development goal 16
- United Nations, 2019, Gender equality
- United Nations, 2020, Rising inequality affecting more than two‐thirds of the globe, but it's NOT inevitable: new UN report
- 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228637.013.77 · DOI
- Voorheis J. McCarty N.&Shor B.(2015)Unequal incomes ideology and gridlock: how rising inequality increases political polarization. Available from:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2649215[Accessed 24th October 2022]. · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108955690.002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1835‐2561.2001.tb00167.x · DOI
- WEF, 2019, These are the top 10 countries for pandemic preparedness, World Economic Forum
- 10.1111/ecpo.12129 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Knudsen, E. L. (2023) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13282 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Anheier, H. K., & Knudsen, E. L.
- Affiliations
- Hertie School (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Knudsen, Edward L.
- Venue
- Global Policy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-12-13
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-148
- ISSN
- 1758-5880 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5899
- OpenAlex
- W4311313007
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 5.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- institutional trust, political leadership, political polarization, accountability, inequality, crisis of democracy, civic literacy, media regulation, codes of conduct, leadership recruitment, elite selection, public discourse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 21st century trust and leadership problem: Quoi faire? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1758-5899.13162
- The paper
- Anheier, H. K., & Knudsen, E. L. (2023). The 21st century trust and leadership problem: Quoi faire? Global Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13162