Cited by 9Political Theory and DemocracyPublic Administration and Political AnalysisElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The 21st century trust and leadership problem: Quoi faire?

Open access

Abstract

Much of the democratic world faces a form of socio‐political crisis. To varying degrees, four trends seem to be present in almost every case: declining institutional trust, failing leadership, increasing political polarisation, and weakened accountability. Although each trend has its own dynamic and causes, they jointly create complex challenges and governance problems for democratic societies. Furthermore, underlying them all is the persistent problem of inequality, which erodes trust, prevents the best leaders from rising to the top, polarises society, and shields elites from accountability. We propose a wide range of potential solutions to this crisis. Of the four, we propose that countries focus primarily on increasing institutional trust and improving leadership potential. Both aspects are particularly impactful and malleable, could influence the other two components and, over time, create a virtuous cycle pulling countries out of crisis. Proposed measures for institutional trust include expanded civic literacy, more expansive regulation of tech platforms, stricter media laws to foster better public discourse and a wider use of codes of conduct. For leadership, we propose more diverse channels and expanded selection pools for leadership recruitment, emphasising ethical conviction and targeted incentives for leadership roles. Essential to all of them, however, is tackling inequality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1758-5899.13162

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1257/aer.20172043 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1080/13504850701720197 · DOI
  3. 10.1515/npf‐2019‐0041 · DOI
  4. 10.5018/economics‐ejournal.ja.2019‐8 · DOI
  5. Applebaum A., 2020, Twilight of democracy: the seductive lure of authoritarianism
  6. Boxell L. Gentzkow M.&Shapiro J.(2021)Cross‐country trends in affective polarization: working paper 26669. NBER Working Papers. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cuellar R., 2009, Social cohesion and democracy
  8. Dalton R.J., 2005, The social transformation of trust in government, World Values Survey, 15, 133
  9. 10.1353/jod.2015.0009 · DOI
  10. Dyer P., 2021, Policy and institutional responses to COVID‐19: South Korea
  11. Eatwell R., 2018, National populism: the revolt against Liberal democracy
  12. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561747 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1540‐6210.2010.02161.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.16997/book24 · DOI
  15. Fukuyama F., 1995, Trust: social virtues and the creation of prosperity
  16. Fukuyama F., 2019, Identity: contemporary identity politics and the struggle for recognition
  17. 10.2307/j.ctt7s1jn · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1136/bmj.n1540 · DOI
  19. Jordahl H., 2007, Handbook of social capital
  20. 10.1525/gp.2020.17639 · DOI
  21. Keeter S., 2021, Americans' trust in government, each other, leaders
  22. Kelton S., 2020, The deficit myth: modern monetary theory and the birth of the people's economy
  23. 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100523 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Levitsky S., 2018, How democracies die
  26. Linz J., 1978, The breakdown of democratic regimes: crisis, breakdown and reequilibration: an introduction
  27. 10.1017/gov.2021.24 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1540‐6237.2012.00864.x · DOI
  29. 10.1177/000276421875957 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/978-3-030-77602-2_10 · DOI
  31. Mudde C., 2019, The far right today
  32. 10.9783/9780812293784 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1353/jod.2006.0050 · DOI
  34. 10.1787/9789264308992-en · DOI
  35. 10.1787/52600c9e-en · DOI
  36. OECD, 2022, Trust in government
  37. 10.18356/ede38028-en · DOI
  38. Pew Research Center, 2021, Public trust in government: 1958–2021
  39. Piketty T., 2021, Time for socialism: dispatches from a world on fire, 2016–2021
  40. 10.1017/9781108671019 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.24874/IJQR15.01-02 · DOI
  42. United Nations, 2021, Sustainable development goal 16
  43. United Nations, 2019, Gender equality
  44. United Nations, 2020, Rising inequality affecting more than two‐thirds of the globe, but it's NOT inevitable: new UN report
  45. 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228637.013.77 · DOI
  46. Voorheis J. McCarty N.&Shor B.(2015)Unequal incomes ideology and gridlock: how rising inequality increases political polarization. Available from:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2649215[Accessed 24th October 2022]. · DOI
  47. 10.1017/9781108955690.002 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1835‐2561.2001.tb00167.x · DOI
  49. WEF, 2019, These are the top 10 countries for pandemic preparedness, World Economic Forum
  50. 10.1111/ecpo.12129 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Anheier, H. K., & Knudsen, E. L.
Affiliations
Hertie School (DE)
Corresponding author
Knudsen, Edward L.
Venue
Global Policy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-12-13
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
139-148
ISSN
  • 1758-5880 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5899
OpenAlex
W4311313007
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
institutional trust, political leadership, political polarization, accountability, inequality, crisis of democracy, civic literacy, media regulation, codes of conduct, leadership recruitment, elite selection, public discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 21st century trust and leadership problem: Quoi faire? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1758-5899.13162
The paper
Anheier, H. K., & Knudsen, E. L. (2023). The 21st century trust and leadership problem: Quoi faire? Global Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13162