Mitigating Disinformation with Civic Constitutionalism: The Case Study of Taiwan
Open accessAbstract
Amid growing concerns over information integrity, disinformation has evolved into a broader and more complex phenomenon now recognized as Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI), posing significant threats to democratic governance. This article explores how Taiwan has harnessed the strength of its vital civil society to counter disinformation as an illustration of “civic constitutionalism,” in which nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and engaged citizens collaborate to advance shared interests and values through sustained engagement in public policy and political institutions. Taiwan's example demonstrates that a civil society‐driven approach can provide a viable alternative to both platform self‐regulation and direct government regulation. The findings reveal that Taiwan's NGOs and engaged citizens, through fact‐checking initiatives, public advocacy, and digital literacy programs, have played a pivotal role in detecting and countering disinformation. These actions have not only compelled governmental responses to foreign information warfare but also acted as a check against excessive state control over online platforms. By fostering constructive collaboration between civil society, governmental bodies, and digital platforms, Taiwan offers a practical model of democratic resilience against the multifaceted challenges of digital threats.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6
- Authors
- Chang, W., & Lin, Y.
- Affiliations
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Wen‐Chen
- Lin, Yu‐teng
- ORCID
- Lin, Yu‐teng
- Venue
- Global Policy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-02-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- S2
- ISSN
- 1758-5880 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5899
- OpenAlex
- W7127303743
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Compagnia di San Paolo
- Università degli Studi di Torino
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- disinformation, civil society, non-governmental organizations, fact-checking, digital literacy, information warfare, democratic resilience, platform self-regulation, Taiwan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review