The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model‐based approaches to unconstrained ordination
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Unconstrained ordination is commonly used in ecology to visualize multivariate data, in particular, to visualize the main trends between different sites in terms of their species composition or relative abundance. Methods of unconstrained ordination currently used, such as non‐metric multidimensional scaling, are algorithm‐based techniques developed and implemented without directly accommodating the statistical properties of the data at hand. Failure to account for these key data properties can lead to misleading results. A model‐based approach to unconstrained ordination can address this issue, and in this study, two types of models for ordination are proposed based on finite mixture models and latent variable models. Each method is capable of handling different data types and different forms of species response to latent gradients. Further strengths of the models are demonstrated via example and simulation. Advantages of model‐based approaches to ordination include the following: residual analysis tools for checking assumptions to ensure the fitted model is appropriate for the data; model selection tools to choose the most appropriate model for ordination; methods for formal statistical inference to draw conclusions from the ordination; and improved efficiency, that is model‐based ordination better recovers true relationships between sites, when used appropriately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · Cited by 13,828
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471721182 · Cited by 10,991
Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists
Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806384 · Cited by 10,674
Distance‐Based Tests for Homogeneity of Multivariate Dispersions
Anderson, M. J. (2006) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00440.x · Cited by 3,304
Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis: A Unified Approach
Bartholomew, D., Knott, M., & Moustaki, I. (2011) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119970583 · Cited by 842
Cited by
So Many Variables: Joint Modeling in Community Ecology
Warton, D. I., Blanchet, F. G., O’Hara, R. B., Ovaskainen, O., Taskinen, S., Walker, S. C., & Hui, F. K. C. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.007 · Cited by 854
Self-citationJoint Species Distribution Modelling: With Applications in R
Ovaskainen, O., & Abrego, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108591720 · Cited by 394
Clark, J. S., Nemergut, D., Seyednasrollah, B., Turner, P. J., & Zhang, S. (2017) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1241 · Cited by 283
Three points to consider when choosing a LM or GLM test for count data
Warton, D. I., Lyons, M., Stoklosa, J., & Ives, A. R. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12552 · Cited by 192
“We hope this changes in the near future, given the rapidly growing list of alternative multivariate methods based on GLMs and their extensions (Yee 2006; Dunstan, Foster & Darnell 2011; Ives & Helmus 2011; Wang et al. 2012; Harris 2015; Hui et al. 2015; Warton et al. 2015).”
MethodSelf-citationModel-based joint visualization of multiple compositional omics datasets
Hawinkel, S., Bijnens, L., Cao, K.-A. L., & Thas, O. (2020) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaa050 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Hui, F. K. C., Taskinen, S., Pledger, S., Foster, S. D., & Warton, D. I.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 399-411
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089835419
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 13.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model‐based approaches to unconstrained ordination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12236
- The paper
- Hui, F. K. C., Taskinen, S., Pledger, S., Foster, S. D., & Warton, D. I. (2015). Model‐based approaches to unconstrained ordination. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12236
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.