The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generating realistic assemblages with a joint species distribution model
Abstract
Summary: Species distribution models (SDMs) represent important analytical and predictive tools for ecologists. Until now, these models have either assumed (i) that species' occurrence probabilities are uncorrelated or (ii) that species respond linearly to preselected environmental variables. These two assumptions currently prevent ecologists from modelling assemblages with realistic co‐occurrence and species richness properties. This paper introduces a stochastic feedforward neural network, called ‘mistnet’, which makes neither assumption. Thus, unlike most SDMs, mistnet can account for non‐independent co‐occurrence patterns driven by unobserved environmental heterogeneity. And unlike several recently proposed joint SDMs, the model can also learn nonlinear functions relating species' occurrence probabilities to environmental predictors. Mistnet makes more accurate predictions about the North American bird communities found along Breeding Bird Survey transects than several alternative methods tested. In particular, typical assemblages held out of sample for validation were each tens of thousands of times more likely under the mistnet model than under independent combinations of single‐species predictions. Apart from improved accuracy, mistnet shows two other important benefits for ecological research and management. First: by analysing co‐occurrence data, mistnet can identify unmeasured – and perhaps unanticipated – environmental variables that drive species turnover. For example, the model identified a strong grassland/forest gradient, even though only temperature and precipitation were given as model inputs. Second: mistnet is able to take advantage of outside information to guide its predictions towards more realistic assemblages. For example, mistnet automatically adjusts its expectations to include more forest‐associated species in response to a stray observation of a forest‐dwelling warbler.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A View of the Em Algorithm that Justifies Incremental, Sparse, and other Variants
Neal, R. M., & Hinton, G. E. (1998) · Learning in Graphical Models · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9_12 · Cited by 2,187
Cited by
So Many Variables: Joint Modeling in Community Ecology
Warton, D. I., Blanchet, F. G., O’Hara, R. B., Ovaskainen, O., Taskinen, S., Walker, S. C., & Hui, F. K. C. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.007 · Cited by 854
Joint Species Distribution Modelling: With Applications in R
Ovaskainen, O., & Abrego, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108591720 · Cited by 394
Clark, J. S., Nemergut, D., Seyednasrollah, B., Turner, P. J., & Zhang, S. (2017) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1241 · Cited by 283
Three points to consider when choosing a LM or GLM test for count data
Warton, D. I., Lyons, M., Stoklosa, J., & Ives, A. R. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12552 · Cited by 192
“We hope this changes in the near future, given the rapidly growing list of alternative multivariate methods based on GLMs and their extensions (Yee 2006; Dunstan, Foster & Darnell 2011; Ives & Helmus 2011; Wang et al. 2012; Harris 2015; Hui et al. 2015; Warton et al. 2015).”
MethodTesting species assemblage predictions from stacked and joint species distribution models
Zurell, D., Zimmermann, N. E., Gross, H., Baltensweiler, A., Sattler, T., & Wüest, R. O. (2020) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.13608 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, D. J.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-18
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-473
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1906079673
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generating realistic assemblages with a joint species distribution model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12332
- The paper
- Harris, D. J. (2015). Generating realistic assemblages with a joint species distribution model. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.