Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial factor analysis: a new tool for estimating joint species distributions and correlations in species range

Open access
Thorson, James T., Scheuerell, Mark D., Shelton, Andrew O., See, Kevin E., Skaug, Hans J., Kristensen, Kasper·2015·Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Summary: Predicting and explaining the distribution and density of species is one of the oldest concerns in ecology. Species distributions can be estimated using geostatistical methods, which estimate a latent spatial variable explaining observed variation in densities, but geostatistical methods may be imprecise for species with low densities or few observations. Additionally, simple geostatistical methods fail to account for correlations in distribution among species and generally estimate such cross‐correlations as a post hoc exercise. We therefore present spatial factor analysis (SFA), a spatial model for estimating a low‐rank approximation to multivariate data, and use it to jointly estimate the distribution of multiple species simultaneously. We also derive an analytic estimate of cross‐correlations among species from SFA parameters. As a first example, we show that distributions for 10 bird species in the breeding bird survey in 2012 can be parsimoniously represented using only five spatial factors. As a second case study, we show that forward prediction of catches for 20 rockfishes (S ebastes spp.) off the U.S. W est C oast is more accurate using SFA than analysing each species individually. Finally, we show that single‐species models give a different picture of cross‐correlations than joint estimation using SFA. Spatial factor analysis complements a growing list of tools for jointly modelling the distribution of multiple species and provides a parsimonious summary of cross‐correlation without requiring explicit declaration of habitat variables. We conclude by proposing future research that would model species cross‐correlations using dissimilarity of species’ traits, and the development of spatial dynamic factor analysis for a low‐rank approximation to spatial time‐series data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/2041-210x.12359

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Thorson, J. T., Scheuerell, M. D., Shelton, A. O., See, K. E., Skaug, H. J., & Kristensen, K.
Venue
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-13
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
627-637
ISSN
2041-210X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147215567
Cited by
175
References
3
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial factor analysis: a new tool for estimating joint species distributions and correlations in species range. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12359
The paper
Thorson, J. T., Scheuerell, M. D., Shelton, A. O., See, K. E., Skaug, H. J., & Kristensen, K. (2015). Spatial factor analysis: a new tool for estimating joint species distributions and correlations in species range. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12359

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.