The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ctmm: an r package for analyzing animal relocation data as a continuous‐time stochastic process
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Movement ecology has developed rapidly over the past decade, driven by advances in tracking technology that have largely removed data limitations. Development of rigorous analytical tools has lagged behind empirical progress, and as a result, relocation data sets have been underutilized. Discrete‐time correlated random walk models (CRW) have long served as the foundation for analyzing relocation data. Unfortunately,CRW s confound the sampling and movement processes.CRW parameter estimates thus depend sensitively on the sampling schedule, which makes it difficult to draw sampling‐independent inferences about the underlying movement process. Furthermore,CRW s cannot accommodate the multiscale autocorrelations that typify modern, finely sampled relocation data sets. Recent developments in modelling movement as a continuous‐time stochastic process (CTSP) solve these problems, but the mathematical difficulty of using CTSP s has limited their adoption in ecology. To remove this roadblock, we introduce the ctmm package for the R statistical computing environment.ctmm implements all of the CTSP s currently in use in the ecological literature and couples them with powerful statistical methods for autocorrelated data adapted from geostatistics and signal processing, including variograms, periodograms and non‐Markovian maximum likelihood estimation. ctmm is built around a standard workflow that begins with visual diagnostics, proceeds to candidate model identification, and then to maximum likelihood fitting and AIC‐based model selection. Once an accurate CTSP for the data has been fitted and selected, analyses that require such a model, such as quantifying home range areas via autocorrelated kernel density estimation or estimating occurrence distributions via time‐series Kriging, can then be performed. We use a case study with African buffalo to demonstrate the capabilities of ctmm and highlight the steps of a typical CTSP movement analysis workflow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Codling, E. A., Plank, M. J., & Benhamou, S. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0014 · Cited by 1,482
Cited by
Michelot, T., Langrock, R., & Patterson, T. A. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12578 · Cited by 432
Social and environmental transmission spread different sets of gut microbes in wild mice
Raulo, A., Bürkner, P.-C., Finerty, G. E., Dale, J., Hanski, E., English, H. M., Lamberth, C., Firth, J. A., Coulson, T., & Knowles, S. C. L. (2024) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02381-0 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Calabrese, J. M., Fleming, C. H., & Gurarie, E.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1124-1132
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2307442473
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ctmm: an r package for analyzing animal relocation data as a continuous‐time stochastic process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12559
- The paper
- Calabrese, J. M., Fleming, C. H., & Gurarie, E. (2016). ctmm: an r package for analyzing animal relocation data as a continuous‐time stochastic process. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.