The DOI matches its Crossref record.
iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers)
Abstract
Summary: Hill numbers (or the effective number of species) have been increasingly used to quantify the species/taxonomic diversity of an assemblage. The sample‐size‐ and coverage‐based integrations of rarefaction (interpolation) and extrapolation (prediction) of H ill numbers represent a unified standardization method for quantifying and comparing species diversity across multiple assemblages. We briefly review the conceptual background of H ill numbers along with two approaches to standardization. We present an R package iNEXT (i N terpolation/EXT rapolation) which provides simple functions to compute and plot the seamless rarefaction and extrapolation sampling curves for the three most widely used members of the H ill number family (species richness, S hannon diversity and S impson diversity). Two types of biodiversity data are allowed: individual‐based abundance data and sampling‐unit‐based incidence data. Several applications of the iNEXT packages are reviewed: (i) Non‐asymptotic analysis: comparison of diversity estimates for equally large or equally complete samples. (ii) Asymptotic analysis: comparison of estimated asymptotic or true diversities. (iii) Assessment of sample completeness (sample coverage) across multiple samples. (iv) Comparison of estimated point diversities for a specified sample size or a specified level of sample coverage. Two examples are demonstrated, using the data (one for abundance data and the other for incidence data) included in the package, to illustrate all R functions and graphical displays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Environmental factors shaping the gut microbiome in a Dutch population
Gacesa, R., Kurilshikov, A., Vich Vila, A., Sinha, T., Klaassen, M. A. Y., Bolte, L. A., Andreu-Sánchez, S., Chen, L., Collij, V., Hu, S., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04567-7 · Cited by 735
Global diversity of microbial communities in marine sediment
Hoshino, T., Doi, H., Uramoto, G.-I., Wörmer, L., Adhikari, R. R., Xiao, N., Morono, Y., D’Hondt, S., Hinrichs, K.-U., & Inagaki, F. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1919139117 · Cited by 412
Microbiota from young mice counteracts selective age-associated behavioral deficits
Boehme, M., Guzzetta, K. E., Bastiaanssen, T. F. S., van de Wouw, M., Moloney, G. M., Gual-Grau, A., Spichak, S., Olavarría-Ramírez, L., Fitzgerald, P., Morillas, E., et al. (2021) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-021-00093-9 · Cited by 313
High frequency of shared clonotypes in human B cell receptor repertoires
Soto, C., Bombardi, R. G., Branchizio, A., Kose, N., Matta, P., Sevy, A. M., Sinkovits, R. S., Gilchuk, P., Finn, J. A., & Crowe, J. E. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0934-8 · Cited by 294
The global distribution of known and undiscovered ant biodiversity
Kass, J. M., Guénard, B., Dudley, K. L., Jenkins, C. N., Azuma, F., Fisher, B. L., Parr, C. L., Gibb, H., Longino, J. T., Ward, P. S., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abp9908 · Cited by 194
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H., & Chao, A.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-08-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1451-1456
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2460850757
- Cited by
- 4,428
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 135.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.12613
- The paper
- Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H., & Chao, A. (2016). iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.