The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning‐based methods for individual recognition in small birds
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Individual identification is a crucial step to answer many questions in evolutionary biology and is mostly performed by marking animals with tags. Such methods are well‐established, but often make data collection and analyses time‐consuming, or limit the contexts in which data can be collected. Recent computational advances, specifically deep learning, can help overcome the limitations of collecting large‐scale data across contexts. However, one of the bottlenecks preventing the application of deep learning for individual identification is the need to collect and identify hundreds to thousands of individually labelled pictures to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Here we describe procedures for automating the collection of training data, generating training datasets, and training CNNs to allow identification of individual birds. We apply our procedures to three small bird species, the sociable weaver Philetairus socius, the great tit Parus major and the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata , representing both wild and captive contexts. We first show how the collection of individually labelled images can be automated, allowing the construction of training datasets consisting of hundreds of images per individual. Second, we describe how to train a CNN to uniquely re‐identify each individual in new images. Third, we illustrate the general applicability of CNNs for studies in animal biology by showing that trained CNNs can re‐identify individual birds in images collected in contexts that differ from the ones originally used to train the CNNs. Finally, we present a potential solution to solve the issues of new incoming individuals. Overall, our work demonstrates the feasibility of applying state‐of‐the‐art deep learning tools for individual identification of birds, both in the laboratory and in the wild. These techniques are made possible by our approaches that allow efficient collection of training data. The ability to conduct individual recognition of birds without requiring external markers that can be visually identified by human observers represents a major advance over current methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More recently, artificial intelligence deep learning models, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), have been developed to identify birds, bats or amphibians36–40.”
From Soundscapes and deep learning enable tracking biodiversity recovery in tropical forests (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148 · cited 1×
“We used the VGG19 convolutional neural network architecture (Simonyan & Zisserman, 2014) and the weights of a network pre-trained on the ImageNet dataset (a dataset with more than 14 million pictures and 20000 classes, Deng et al., 2009).”
MethodAdam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333 · cited 2×
“We used the VGG19 convolutional neural network architecture (Simonyan & Zisserman, 2014) and the weights of a network pre-trained on the ImageNet dataset (a dataset with more than 14 million pictures and 20000 classes, Deng et al., 2009).”
MethodNIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Ferreira A. C., 2020, AndreCFerreira/Bird_individualID: Bird_individualID (version 1.0), Zenodo
- Huang G. B. Ramesh M. Berg T. &Learned‐Miller E.(2007).Labeled faces in the wild: A database for studying face recognition in unconstrained environments.Technical Report(pp.7–49).Amherst MA:University of Massachusetts.
- Sünderhauf N., 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Workshop on Long‐Term Autonomy
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–203 of 203
Bourbon, T., Blanchon, T., Champagnon, J., & Pradalier, C. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39385-2_25
Sketch-Market1501: A Sketch-to-RGB Cross-Modal Person Re-Identification Dataset and Benchmark
Wang, W., & Zhu, D. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15100685
Madhuanand, L., Philippart, C. J. M., Nijland, W., de Jong, S. M., Bijleveld, A. I., & Addink, E. A. (2026) · European Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/22797254.2026.2726637
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferreira, A. C., Silva, L. R., Renna, F., Brandl, H. B., Renoult, J. P., Farine, D. R., Covas, R., & Doutrelant, C.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Ferreira, André C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-07-26
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1072-1085
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3038699438
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (CEECIND/01970/2017, IF/01411/2014/CP1256/CT0007, PTDC/BIA‐EVF/5249/201, SFRH/BD/122106/2016)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐ 15‐CE32‐0012‐02, ANR 19‐CE02‐0014‐02)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FA 1402/4‐1, 422037984)
- University of Cape Town
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Keywords
- individual recognition, small birds, convolutional neural networks, sociable weaver, Parus major, zebra finch, re-identification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review