The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a more balanced combination of multiple traits when computing functional differences between species
Abstract
Functional trait differences between species are key drivers of community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Quantifying these differences routinely requires using approaches like the Gower distance to combine various types of traits into a multi‐trait dissimilarity. Without special care, the Gower distance can however produce a multi‐trait dissimilarity with a disproportional contribution of certain traits, particularly categorical traits and bundle of correlated traits reflecting similar ecological functions. These effects persist even after applying multivariate analyses traditionally used to reduce trait dimensionality. We propose the ‘gawdis’ R function, and corresponding package, to produce multi‐trait dissimilarity with more uniform contributions of different traits, including fuzzy coded ones. The approach is based on minimizing the differences in the correlation between the dissimilarity of each trait, or groups of traits, and the multi‐trait dissimilarity. This is done using either an analytical or a numerical solution, both available in the function. Properly taking into account the contribution of multiple traits into multi‐trait dissimilarity is key for interpreting the ecological effects of complex species differences. The gawdis r package in CRAN can be further applied to improve equitability in distance‐based measures in other field of research, such as social sciences or marketing surveys, which routinely analyse mixed type data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments
Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., de Bello, F., Quétier, F., Grigulis, K., & Robson, T. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704716104 · Cited by 1,658
Cited by
mFD: an R package to compute and illustrate the multiple facets of functional diversity
Magneville, C., Loiseau, N., Albouy, C., Casajus, N., Claverie, T., Escalas, A., Leprieur, F., Maire, E., Mouillot, D., & Villéger, S. (2022) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.05904 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- de Bello, F., Botta‐Dukát, Z., Lepš, J., & Fibich, P.
- Venue
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-12-15
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 443-448
- ISSN
- 2041-210X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3108079630
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a more balanced combination of multiple traits when computing functional differences between species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/2041-210x.13537
- The paper
- de Bello, F., Botta‐Dukát, Z., Lepš, J., & Fibich, P. (2021). Towards a more balanced combination of multiple traits when computing functional differences between species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13537
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.