Cited by 12Historical Astronomy and Related StudiesHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesArchaeology and Historical Studies

An ancient Arabian zodiac. The constellations in the Safaitic inscriptions, Part II

Al‐Jallad, Ahmad·2016·Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy

Abstract

The second part of ‘An ancient Arabian zodiac. The constellations in the Safaitic inscriptions’ discusses the position of the Arabian zodiac vis‐à‐vis other parapegmata from antiquity, and takes up a comparative etymological study of the zodiac names in an attempt to locate their source. Four appendices discussing tangential issues that arose in the course of this study follow.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aae.12069

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • rʾy and ṭʿn in Safaitic refer to a calendar based on the movement of the stars.

    “The recent recognition that rʾy and ṭʿn in Safaitic refer to a calendar based on the movement of the stars (Al-Jallad 2014; 2016)”

    From Dadanitic <i>b-rʾy</i> as referring to a local calendar? (2020) · cites this paper as Al-Jallad 2016

  • The system survives only in remnants, sometimes adapted to other systems as in Yemen and the Safaitic inscriptions, probably because such calendars are not very practical for administrative purposes due to their lack of specificity and uniformity.

    “The reason we probably only see remnants of this system, sometimes adapted to other systems as in Yemen (Varisco 1993) and the Safaitic inscriptions (Al-Jallad 2016), is probably due to the fact that they are not very practical for administrative purposes, due to their lack of specificity and uniformity.”

    From Dadanitic <i>b-rʾy</i> as referring to a local calendar? (2020) · cites this paper as Al-Jallad 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al‐Jallad, A.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Al‐Jallad, Ahmad
Venue
Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-22
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
84-106
ISSN
  • 0905-7196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0471
OpenAlex
W2168747299
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arabian archaeology and epigraphy (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
Keywords
Safaitic inscriptions, constellations, etymology, ancient astronomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review