The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme (ETS)
Abstract
In M arch 2008, the A ustralian Government announced its intention to introduce a national Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), now expected to start in 2015. This impending development provides an ideal setting to investigate the impact an ETS in A ustralia will have on the market valuation of A ustralian Securities Exchange (ASX) firms. This is the first empirical study into the pricing effects of the ETS in A ustralia. Primarily, we hypothesize that firm value will be negatively related to a firm's carbon intensity profile. That is, there will be a greater impact on firm value for high carbon emitters in the period prior (2007) to the introduction of the ETS, whether for reasons relating to the existence of unbooked liabilities associated with future compliance and/or abatement costs, or for reasons relating to reduced future earnings. Using a sample of 58 A ustralian listed firms (constrained by the current availability of emissions data) which comprise larger, more profitable and less risky listed A ustralian firms, we first undertake an event study focusing on five distinct information events argued to impact the probability of the proposed ETS being enacted. Here, we find direct evidence that the capital market is indeed pricing the proposed ETS. Second, using a modified version of the Ohlson () valuation model, we undertake a valuation analysis designed not only to complement the event study results, but more importantly to provide insights into the capital market's assessment of the magnitude of the economic impact of the proposed ETS as reflected in market capitalization. Here, our results show that the market assesses the most carbon intensive sample firms a market value decrement relative to other sample firms of between 7% and 10% of market capitalization. Further, based on the carbon emission profile of the sample firms we imply a ‘future carbon permit price’ of between AUD$17 per tonne and AUD$26 per tonne of carbon dioxide emitted. This study is more precise than industry reports, which set a carbon price of between AUD$15 to AUD$74 per tonne.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures
Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50629 · Cited by 1,681
Carbon Risk, Carbon Risk Awareness and the Cost of Debt Financing
Jung, J., Herbohn, K., & Clarkson, P. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3207-6 · Cited by 772
Self-citationTrumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1900 · Cited by 543
Corporate Incentives to Disclose Carbon Information: Evidence from the CDP Global 500 Report
Luo, L., Lan, Y., & Tang, Q. (2012) · Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting · doi:10.1111/j.1467-646x.2012.01055.x · Cited by 448
Market responses to firms’ voluntary carbon disclosure: Empirical evidence from the United Kingdom
Alsaifi, K., Elnahass, M., & Salama, A. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121377 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapple, L., Clarkson, P. M., & Gold, D. L.
- Venue
- Abacus
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-19
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-33
- ISSN
- 0001-3072 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6281
- OpenAlex
- W1641101836
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme (ETS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/abac.12006
- The paper
- Chapple, L., Clarkson, P. M., & Gold, D. L. (2013). The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme (ETS). Abacus. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.