Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ouabain and chloroquine trigger senolysis of BRAF‐V600E‐induced senescent cells by targeting autophagy

L’Hôte, Valentin, Courbeyrette, Régis, Pinna, Guillaume, Cintrat, Jean‐Christophe, Le Pavec, Gwenaëlle, Delaunay‐Moisan, Agnès, Mann, Carl, Thuret, Jean‐Yves·2021·Aging Cell

Abstract

The expression of BRAF‐V600E triggers oncogene‐induced senescence in normal cells and is implicated in the development of several cancers including melanoma. Here, we report that cardioglycosides such as ouabain are potent senolytics in BRAF senescence. Sensitization by ATP1A1 knockdown and protection by supplemental potassium showed that senolysis by ouabain was mediated by the Na,K‐ATPase pump. Both ion transport inhibition and signal transduction result from cardioglycosides binding to Na,K‐ATPase. An inhibitor of the pump that does not trigger signaling was not senolytic despite blocking ion transport, demonstrating that signal transduction is required for senolysis. Ouabain triggered the activation of Src, p38, Akt, and Erk in BRAF‐senescent cells, and signaling inhibitors prevented cell death. The expression of BRAF‐V600E increased ER stress and autophagy in BRAF‐senescent cells and sensitized the cell to senolysis by ouabain. Ouabain inhibited autophagy flux, which was restored by signaling inhibitors. Consequently, we identified autophagy inhibitor chloroquine as a novel senolytic in BRAF senescence based on the mode of action of cardioglycosides. Our work underlies the interest of characterizing the mechanisms of senolytics to discover novel compounds and identifies the endoplasmic reticulum stress‐autophagy tandem as a new vulnerability in BRAF senescence that can be exploited for the development of further senolytic strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acel.13447

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bafilomycin A1 disrupts cytoprotective autophagy in senescent cells, leading to accumulation of damaged mitochondria and apoptotic cell death.

    “bafilomycin A1 disrupts cytoprotective autophagy in SnCs, leading to accumulation of damaged mitochondria and apoptotic cell death51.”

    From Emerging strategies in senotherapeutics: from broad-spectrum senolysis to precision reprogramming (2026) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Results section (‘Autophagy inhibitors are senolytic in BRAF senescence’; page unavailable) reports that bafilomycin A1 was senolytic in BRAF-V600E-induced senescent fibroblasts, though less potent than chloroquine. The Discussion reports bafilomycin A1-induced apoptosis in therapy-induced senescent mouse lymphomas. Our copy does not report accumulation of damaged mitochondria, and these findings do not establish the stated mechanism across senescent cells generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1002/prp2.505 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41598-018-29995-2 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s00280-009-0929-5 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s00018-009-9018-5 · DOI
  5. Carvalho C., 2019, Glucocorticoids delay RAF‐induced senescence promoted by EGR1, Journal of Cell Science, 132, 10.1242/jcs.230748 · DOI
  6. 10.3389/fphys.2017.00371 · DOI
  7. 10.3390/molecules22060990 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nm.4385 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/s41467-017-00314-z · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.4161/auto.28594 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/onc.2011.481 · DOI
  13. 10.14348/molcells.2017.2279 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101337 · DOI
  15. 10.4161/auto.27163 · DOI
  16. 10.1172/JCI70454 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/s41598-020-61920-4 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.vascn.2018.09.001 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.06.049 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.18632/aging.101633 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.06.149 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.mrrev.2020.108321 · DOI
  23. 10.1056/NEJMoa1502583 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.05.036 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0735 · DOI
  26. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2939 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1021/bi4011804 · DOI
  28. 10.1124/mol.110.063974 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/acel.12445 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
L’Hôte, V., Courbeyrette, R., Pinna, G., Cintrat, J., Le Pavec, G., Delaunay‐Moisan, A., Mann, C., & Thuret, J.
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-06
Volume
20
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 1474-9718
  • 1474-9726
Cited by
37
References
17
Language
en
Funders
Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review