Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A genome‐wide association study of the frailty index highlights brain pathways in ageing

Open access
Atkins, Janice L., Jylhävä, Juulia, Pedersen, Nancy L., Magnusson, Patrik K., Lu, Yi, Wang, Yunzhang, Hägg, Sara, Melzer, David, Williams, Dylan M., Pilling, Luke C.·2021·Aging Cell

Abstract

Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome and strongly associated with disability, mortality and hospitalization. Frailty is commonly measured using the frailty index (FI), based on the accumulation of a number of health deficits during the life course. The mechanisms underlying FI are multifactorial and not well understood, but a genetic basis has been suggested with heritability estimates between 30 and 45%. Understanding the genetic determinants and biological mechanisms underpinning FI may help to delay or even prevent frailty. We performed a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) meta‐analysis of a frailty index in European descent UK Biobank participants ( n = 164,610, 60–70 years) and Swedish TwinGene participants ( n = 10,616, 41–87 years). FI calculation was based on 49 or 44 self‐reported items on symptoms, disabilities and diagnosed diseases for UK Biobank and TwinGene, respectively. 14 loci were associated with the FI ( p < 5*10 −8 ). Many FI‐associated loci have established associations with traits such as body mass index, cardiovascular disease, smoking, HLA proteins, depression and neuroticism; however, one appears to be novel. The estimated single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) heritability of the FI was 11% (0.11, SE 0.005). In enrichment analysis, genes expressed in the frontal cortex and hippocampus were significantly downregulated (adjusted p < 0.05). We also used Mendelian randomization to identify modifiable traits and exposures that may affect frailty risk, with a higher educational attainment genetic risk score being associated with a lower degree of frailty. Risk of frailty is influenced by many genetic factors, including well‐known disease risk factors and mental health, with particular emphasis on pathways in the brain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acel.13459

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Metadata

Authors
Atkins, J. L., Jylhävä, J., Pedersen, N. L., Magnusson, P. K., Lu, Y., Wang, Y., Hägg, S., Melzer, D., Williams, D. M., & Pilling, L. C.
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-25
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
e13459-e13459
ISSN
  • 1474-9718 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-9726
OpenAlex
W3194731752
Cited by
319
References
64
FWCI
20.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A genome‐wide association study of the frailty index highlights brain pathways in ageing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/acel.13459
The paper
Atkins, J. L., Jylhävä, J., Pedersen, N. L., Magnusson, P. K., Lu, Y., Wang, Y., Hägg, S., Melzer, D., Williams, D. M., & Pilling, L. C. (2021). A genome‐wide association study of the frailty index highlights brain pathways in ageing. Aging Cell. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13459

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.