Glioblastoma and its treatment are associated with extensive accelerated brain aging
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Progressive neurocognitive dysfunction is the leading cause of a reduced quality of life in patients with primary brain tumors. Understanding how the human brain responds to cancer and its treatment is essential to improve the associated cognitive sequelae. In this study, we performed integrated transcriptomic and tissue analysis on postmortem normal‐appearing non‐tumor brain tissue from glioblastoma (GBM) patients that had received cancer treatments, region‐matched brain tissue from unaffected control individuals and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. We show that normal‐appearing non‐tumor brain regions of patients with GBM display hallmarks of accelerated aging, in particular mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, and proteostasis deregulation. The extent and spatial pattern of this response decreased with distance from the tumor. Gene set enrichment analyses and a direct comparative analysis with an independent cohort of brain tissue samples from AD patients revealed a significant overlap in differentially expressed genes and a similar biological aging trajectory. Additionally, these responses were validated at the protein level showing the presence of increased lysosomal lipofuscin, phosphorylated microtubule‐associated protein Tau, and oxidative DNA damage in normal‐appearing brain areas of GBM patients. Overall, our data show that the brain of GBM patients undergoes accelerated aging and shared AD‐like features, providing the basis for novel or repurposed therapeutic targets for managing brain tumor‐related side effects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625 · see citing works
Tau-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease
Congdon, E. E., & Sigurdsson, E. M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-018-0013-z · Cited by 1,113 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The results of this study provide the basis for further testing existing or novel AD therapies, including therapeutic strategies targeting p-Tau aggregation (Congdon & Sigurdsson, 2018 ), in brain tumor patients thereby improving their quality of life.”
BackgroundThe central role of DNA damage in the ageing process
Schumacher, B., Pothof, J., Vijg, J., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03307-7 · Cited by 907 · see citing works
The importance of tau phosphorylation for neurodegenerative diseases
Noble, W., Hanger, D. P., Miller, C. C. J., & Lovestone, S. (2013) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2013.00083 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Contributions of DNA Damage to Alzheimer’s Disease
Lin, X., Kapoor, A., Gu, Y., Chow, M. J., Peng, J., Zhao, K., & Tang, D. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21051666 · Cited by 117 · cited 1× · see citing works
“DNA damage and reduced expression of DNA damage response proteins have also been implicated in AD (Lin et al., 2020; Sykora et al., 2015 ).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Ainslie, A. P., Klaver, M., Voshart, D. C., Gerrits, E., den Dunnen, W. F. A., Eggen, B. J. L., Bergink, S., & Barazzuol, L.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
- Corresponding author
- Bergink, Steven
- Barazzuol, Lara
- ORCID
- Venue
- Aging Cell
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-01-17
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e14066-e14066
- ISSN
- 1474-9718 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-9726
- PMC
- PMC10928584
- OpenAlex
- W4390977789
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Aging Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- KWF Kankerbestrijding (11148, 12487)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Keywords
- glioblastoma, accelerated brain aging, normal-appearing brain tissue, Alzheimer's disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, proteostasis, tau phosphorylation, oxidative DNA damage, cancer treatment side effects, neurocognitive impairment, postmortem brain, transcriptomics
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Glioblastoma, Humans, Quality of Life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review